Wednesday, 27 August 2008

"I was raped! Oh, I mean, I wasn't. Sorry."

Woman who made false rape claim against her ex-fiance walks free from court



Gemma Capon, 20, invented the allegation after she and Graham Tysoe's turbulent six-month relationship came to an end.

...

Yet, instead of a six-month maximum jail term, Capon was given a 12-week suspended sentence and ordered to pay £95 costs.


I'm sure she could earn that much by giving 190 blow-jobs in a back-alley. Slag.

Mr Tysoe, who had an alibi, was released on bail and later that day Capon, a fast-food waitress, admitted lying to the police.

Officers spent 156 hours investigating the false claims, the court was told.

Alan Hurst, mitigating, said his client was 'genuinely sorry'.


Oh, well, that's all right then:

"Look here judge I'm (a) in possession of a cunt and (b) 'sorry', and thus I can go free right? Yeah, thanks very much."

Another day, another 'rape'-allegation, another horrifyingly ugly whore with a grudge whose flash of the Cunt-Pass lets her avoid jail for all but ruining a man's life.

35 comments:

Anonymous said...

I must have missed it when we created a law that says stupid cunts are not liable for perjury.

deadlynightshade said...

If you put a wart on her nose and a broom she'd look like a real witch.

Anonymous said...

Anyone who makes a false statement like that should be charged and convicted as a felon. I keep reading about men who spent up to 30 years in jail for a rape they did not commit. What this bitch did was extremely damaging to this guy, now he has to live with the label of rapist for years or decades to come. Doesn't this cunt know that there is no lower form of life in prison than a sex offender? It seems to men she was really trying to get this guy killed, as well as jailed. Perjury can get you 5 years in U.S. federal prison for each count, they should at least lock her up for two or three years just for making a false report to police.

N said...

The only upside to Britain becoming a total surveillance society, with a dedicated camera up every citizen's arsehole 24/7, is that bitter, worthless slags like this will have their evil lies exposed more easily. Unless of course Nu Labia elects to dispense with due process and just move straight from accusation to sentencing.

Anonymous said...

If they were going to let her go free they could have at least charged her for the 195 hours of police labor spent to investigate her lie.

A $175 fine? Shoot if that is all it costs to make up lies against people I have a bunch of whoppers I could tell.

Martin said...

I lived in a large town near Peterborough many years ago. A similar thing happened there. Some cheap slag got home late and into trouble from her parents. So, she told them she'd been raped.

Next thing she's down the plod shop. So now she has to give a description of the rapist. So what does she do? She just thinks of some bloke she'd seen in a pub (never met) and told the Police that was him.

Next thing man is arrested and banged up in jail on remand.

Only several months later does the girl admit she'd lied and had been with her boyfriend instead.

Man eventually gets released but of course is continually referred to as that rapist bloke. Life destroyed.

silly little slag thinks its funny. I think she got a slap on the wrist for it.

I tell you what. If some slag did that to me.....

Mike Hunter said...

I don't understand why judges even bother to give 'suspended sentences'.

I mean if you're just going to set them free, then; just rule that they only have to pay court costs, then they can go. At least that way you're being honest about it. Instead of hoping to fool naive citizens who are inclined to vote, that don't know that "suspended sentence" really means no sentence.

Captain Zarmband said...

Yet another case of false accusation and yet the only problem, as far as the officials are concerned, is the waste of police time and public money. No mention of the fact that this poor man has had the threat of a long prison sentence hanging over him nor any thought about the damage to his reputation. And as usual no prison sentence for the false accuser. The funny thing is that if this bitch had made a false insurance claim she'd all most certainly have been jailed.

Bobby.N said...

If the person lied (knowingly & willingly) - then they should cop the same sentence/fine as they were only too happy to be heaped upon the innocent victim... AT THE VERY LEAST.

I can't believe the 'goddess' mentality that still prevails in our western cultures in regard to women. No matter what they do, all they need to do is say 'whoops, sorry' (and bat the eyelashes) - and its swept under the carpet.

I can't stand it.

-Bobby.N

tegz said...

Good to see that in the original article- comments nearly all were sympathetic to the sad 'n wiser man in the case.
A few not so much so -but it seems like ,sentencing apart -we have reached a public nadir over the limits of permissive feminastyism.

Xaver said...

Shielding false accusers from accountability obviously just encourages malicious women to abuse the system. Also, by permitting women to cry “Rape!” falsely, the real rape victims suffer. Resources wasted on fakers detract from legitimate cases. This outrageous leniency may eventually change people’s perception about the seriousness of rape as well. Additionally, authorities may become routinely skeptical of women because they are so accustomed to dealing with false allegations.

When men go to prison for rape, we all know what happens to them. Rape is no doubt a serious crime with life altering consequences. Thus, it is only fitting that false rape accusers endure similar ramifications as rapists. Not suggesting they would or should experience rape (as men convicted of rape do, innocent or not.) however; they should at least serve equal prison terms. Imagine the outcry if a man admitted committing rape yet walked away scot-free. Feminists would riot in the streets and rightly so. Yet evil women who destroy men’s lives and mar their reputations face little to no repercussions.

If society refuses to take fake accusations seriously, then real rape victims may eventually face indifference when coming forward, supposing investigators even have time for a proper investigation.

It is really in women’s best long-term interest to crackdown on false accusers.

Anonymous said...

Duncan, what is the word 'Sorry' doing in the title?

schwing said...

She's just 20? If in a kind mood, I would have guessed 45.

Why are women aging faster?

Anonymous said...

false accusers of rape should recieve a rapists sentence, as feminists tell us "there's no crime more heinus than rape" there is one, LYING ABOUT IT. women being encarcerated for this crime will never happen. feminists & governments love this kind of man control, thus they never stick up for men. working class men will never see sexual equality with women - there would be no-one left to take the piss out of.

Anonymous said...

Wouldn't it be poetic justice if these bitches were really raped after their false accusations? Brutally ganged raped, and she can't see any of her rapists.

Then when she goes crying to the cops, no one believes her anymore.

You all know what happened to the boy who cried wolf.

On a related side note, it is a good thing to avoid social contact with females, or at the very least keep it to a formal, essential minimum (eg. workplace, work related).

There's no shame (no STDs too) in not getting laid - to a man, women rank very low in this great game called life. Also, they are dream killers, resource drainers and amusing distractions.

KARMA said...

Now Graham Tysoe's should sue the arse off Gemma Capon, and the mens rights should help out, time to unite and fight!She should be made an example of.

KARMA1 said...

"Gemma Capon, 20, invented the allegation after she and Graham Tysoe's turbulent six-month relationship came to an end."

Hmm I bet he dumped her...

KARMA said...

Well until we get rid of the two party system in western countries things will NEVER CHANGE!

Anonymous said...

DUNCAN, of course your arguments are logical, rational and correct. However, women (for the most part) are neither logical nor rational.

So, the the thing to understand about girls is they most all suffer from fierce anxiety. An anxious man will not get a woman, unless she is your intellectual equal or you happen to be rich.

The badboy or 'yob' as you brits call them, have little anxiety.. and screw up all the time and are dumb. Girls are HARDWIRED to want a low-anxiety male.

Somehow, I suppose you already know this.

Just A Guy With A Thought said...

This post doesn't have anything to do with the above (if she lied then yes, clearly she is liable).

I just wanted to tell this, eternal bachelor guy, that without reading that name one could tell that you are single (or had a miserable wife who counts down the days until your death. In fact, if you were married, i'd bet you beat your wife every day). One day, you will be very lonely, enjoy.

phoenix said...

It used to be they'd use a generic guy's name, or they'd just say "my husband said" but now we need to add "just a guy" to feminist bingo.

Anonymous said...

just a guy with a thought is the kind of mangina that all realm thinking men need to steer clear of at all times.

Anonymous said...

just a guy? 20 quid says you aint usual bollocks. Twat its cos of you sites like this exist, retard.

deadlynightshade said...

Just A Guy With A Thought AKA Retarded Man,

He has never been married and never will. He can get more ass than a toilet seat and that is why marriage doesn't matter much to him. He is well aware of the liability placed on him if married to a cunt since she could simply take him to divorce court and financially rape him for nothing other than being bored with the marriage. Marrying a woman in a western country has no benefit and men take all the risk. Why marry when sex is free? Buying cows when the milk is free doesn't make sense, now does it?

wolfboy69 said...

Just A Guy With A Thought said...
This post doesn't have anything to do with the above (if she lied then yes, clearly she is liable).

I just wanted to tell this, eternal bachelor guy, that without reading that name one could tell that you are single (or had a miserable wife who counts down the days until your death. In fact, if you were married, i'd bet you beat your wife every day). One day, you will be very lonely, enjoy.


jagwat - you really need to shut it. If all you are going to do is make troll comments, if I was EB, I'd ban you from this site.

A false rape accusation was made, which has the real consequence of destroying this guy's life. That is as serious as it gets. Honestly, I hope you get slapped with a false rape charge. Just to see if you think it's funny to then make trollish comments on a blog. ASSHAT

Bobby.N said...

JUST A GUY WITH A THOUGHT SAID:
“This post doesn't have anything to do with the above…I just wanted to tell this, eternal bachelor guy… that you are single (or had a miserable wife who counts down the days until your death. In fact, if you were married, i'd bet you beat your wife every day). One day, you will be very lonely, enjoy.”


Typical.
First this feminist tries to claim that the post previous to them isn’t staying on topic – then in the very next breath goes off topic himself by character assassinating Duncan.

”… one could tell that you are single (or had a miserable wife who counts down the days until your death. In fact, if you were married, i'd bet you beat your wife every day).”

How can you tell?
Because you, like, y’know, just feel it, like?

I suspect Duncan allowed your post for precisely the reason of showing everyone just how juvenile feminists can be… in which case – I’ve just ruined the joke.

Sorry.

-Bobby.N

sobers said...

The post above (05:07)made me laugh. Is that the best you can do? Don't bother actually debating with the author, just insult his character, having never met the guy? Absolutely typical. Usual feminist shaming tactics. No arguing one's case, just straight in with the personal abuse!

Hmh said...

My take on this is that, yes, it's an extremely angry post that Duncan's put up, with one hell of a lot of angry language going with it.

I think it's justified.

Face it, if you're a man, you can and will be arrested - in front of your workmates or your family - without corroberating evidence or witnesses - simply on the say-so of some woman. You may not even know her. Then the media will delight in publishing your name and your photograph, possibly before you've even entered a courtroom for trial - never mind being convicted.

No other class of crime is treated this way except high-profile domestic violence. You're accused: now your life is trashed. That's it.

Rape is a very, very serious crime.

So is destroying someone's life.

It's just that one carries twenty to life through most of the western world, in prisons where you can quite realistically expect to get smashed up, stabbed or raped yourself... and the other carries (at worst) a fine, or about three to six months in a minimum security prison with non-violent offenders, if convicted of wasting police time. Perjury is a bit more serious but also less likely.

In short, it's not fair, in fact it's bloody dangerous, and it's another damn good reason for good men to avoid women.

Anonymous said...

10 dollars on "just a guy with a thought" who posted 03 September 2008 05:07 being a woman (i.e possessing a vagina).

Even the most hardcore manginas would have posted something of greater substance than that drivel. Female shaming tactics are very predictable once you have grasped the basics of them. After all, they are simple tactics from simple minds.

Anonymous said...

Just a guy with a thought sounds a whole lot like just a woman with an opinion. Amazing how dedicated and persistent some trolls are.

Anonymous said...

Women like this one give all women a bad name. Women like this cunt are all too common, and the only way for men to defend their livelihoods, families, reputations and lives is to avoid all unnecessary contact with women.

Anonymous said...

feminists tell us "there's no crime more heinus than rape"

Actually there is one. Ask any woman which would she choose. Be raped -OR- have her children taken away from her forever. Never see them again. Invariably she would choose rape. Also, if rape was so horrible then why do females lie about being raped all the time?

Anonymous said...

Murdering an innocent human being in the womb is the worst crime against humanity because they are the most helpless. And women commit these crimes every day all over the world at a rate that is staggering. 40,000,000 per year worldwide. The female human being is the most violent and murderous species to ever walk planet earth.

Anonymous said...

Pravda comments that the growth of the so-called "sex industry" develops in direct parallel to the growth of feminism.

http://english.pravda.ru/society/sex/106370-1/

Masculist Man said...

I can't believe the 'goddess' mentality that still prevails in our western cultures in regard to women. No matter what they do, all they need to do is say 'whoops, sorry' (and bat the eyelashes) - and its swept under the carpet.

It's the manginas that enable these cunts to do this and it is manginas who are shoting down the MRM that responds to this injustice.