Wednesday, 12 March 2008

It takes (men's) money to make money (for women)

The Annual Smug-Thieving-Fuck-Holding-A-Red-Briefcase Ceremony

There was also praise for a new £12.5m investment fund which will specifically target women entrepreneurs. Pam Alexander, co-chair of the Women's Enterprise Task Force, said: "We have advocated the creation of such a fund for women as one of our top five priorities. This fund presents an opportunity to create a bridge between aspiring entrepreneurs and capital."

Sure, why not throw twelve and a half million squid at women and their batty ideas for businesses. Let the men who start businesses on their own initiative and who risk bankruptcy by begging for small-business loans to get off the ground fork out the taxes to cover this cost.

It is astonishing that women will bang on and on about how equal - nay, superior - they are to men, yet see no contradiction in demanding special treatment. This Mzz Alexander seems to effortlessly put on a positive spin to what is quite frankly an acknowledgement by the government that women are fucking useless in business, hence the need to have a 'bridge between aspiring entrepreneurs and capital'; i.e. lots of money to fund half-baked schemes.

But only those half-baked schemes thought up by women. Obviously.

Making such a fund available to men too would come close to 'sexual equality', something feminists worship only when convenient but regard with horror when it may puts them and all other non-willie-owners at a disadvantage.

And there's loads of taxes going on booze too. As usual. Fucking hell, how unfair is that? How can they make booze more expensive? Getting fucking smashed out our skulls is the only way us Brits can try and blot out the horror of finding ourselves lingering in the wretched over-taxed Socialist shithole of an EU-region this former-country has become.

Well, we could try armed insurrection, but guns are outlawed. So, as the old saying goes; only the outlaws have guns. Like the government.

And I see Child Benefit is going up too. Great. That means childless people like me are going to be subsidising people with kids even more and working people with kids are going to be subsidising workshy single mothers even more.

It does seem that single mothers will not get any extra benefits beyond simple unemployment benefit once their illegitimate bastards turn 12; whoopee-fucking-do, that'll mean they'll just get knocked up again before their existing bastard turns 12 instead of 18 like they currently do. Everyone knows the majority of single mothers become single mothers deliberately for the sole purpose of avoiding having to work for a living.

If you readers of this humble blog will excuse me, I'm off to drink a load of Victory Gin and then I'm going to lean out of my bedroom window and shake my fist in the general direction of Westminster whilst shouting "Cocksuckers!" until I either pass-out on the window-ledge or a neighbour calls the police, whichever conclusion to the night occurs soonest.

This fucking cuntry!


Anonymous said...

"This fucking cuntry!"

Which fucked up cuntry are you talking about?

There are so many nowadays. All feminized (western) countries are fucked.


yy said...

"Getting fucking smashed out our skulls is the only way us Brits can try and blot out the horror of finding ourselves lingering in the wretched over-taxed Socialist shithole of an EU-region this former-country has become.

Well, we could try armed insurrection, but guns are outlawed. So, as the old saying goes; only the outlaws have guns. Like the government."

pure gold. speaking of which: BUY GOLD/SILVER. the financial system can collapse any day now.

Anonymous said...

Feminism has been a blight on my life. It has obstructed, even prevented me from realising my absolute potential as a man and creature of nature. It has corrupted every relationship, perverted how others have perceived me, how I have perceived others, and endeared a rotten and reluctant misogyny within my breast for that deranged part of the female of our breed which kneels at the alter of the feminist lie.

Of course, the nature of this misogyny is borne out of resentment for experiences lost and is vengeful and bitter in it's reluctance, as as much as I loathe them, I delight in the true feminine.

Now, I should temper my earlier remarks about the female with an insight on how, during my youth, I related to girls/women. From an early age, I had adored the feminine. My own sweet mother was the very definition of woman; kind, warm and gentle, completely female in every way, yet strong and able to deal with those multitude of problems inherrent in life at the lower end of the economic scale.

My earliest recollection of this appreciation of the `Fairer Sex` was the film `Sword of Lancelot` with Cornel Wilde. I could not have been more than seven years old old and was captivated by the beauty and grace of Jean Wallace's Guinevere, and the superbly masculine, chivalrous and courageous Lancelot of Cornel Wilde. I think it fair to say that it was this film which planted the seed in me, at that young age, which grew into the man that I became. Of course there were others, the beautiful and elegant actresses of a Hollywood long since transformed into the Neo-Politico mind control, social engineering weapon that it is today, complete with the awful Angelina Jolie's, Uma Thurman's and Demi Moores and their contempories. It was the beautiful yet tragic love between Lancelot and Guinevere which began the process which led to the forming of a huge piece of my adult persona.

Most people today, reading the above, would regard these sentiments as being `corny` and outdated, but I feel that you, will understand these things.

As I matured into adolescence, I discovered girls at a relatively early age, around twelve years I believe. I matured quickly and became strong and athletic. I played Rugby, Boxed, learnt Karate and was generally a handful for my parents and teachers alike. Not in a bad way, but in a boyish rambunctious manner which tended to endear me to some and not to others.

I entered my teens, in the 1970's, perhaps `The last days of Rome` for Great Britain . At this time, girls began to show interest in me, and I in them. But even at that stage, I could see that I treated them differently from my classmates. Years of Hollywood images of heroes and heroines had created a `throwback` who treated pretty girls like Princesses, and respectfully tolerated the `Plain Janes`.

I met my first Wife at the age of sixteen. She was a beautiful girl of mixed Irish/Spanish ancestry, with flashing eyes and long lustrous hair of the darkest brown. I quickly adored her and she I. It was young love. We were perfect together, and we grew to be inseparable. I `protected` her against all other advances, and became a `man` through her and our love. She was gentle, exquisitely feminine, yet full of fire and temper. She gave to me at that tender age a loyalty and devotion that to this day, I have only found in one other. Even now, three lifetimes on, in those precious ethereal moments, just before consciousness returns and steals from us our dreams of what is and can never be, I somtimes remember that glorious beauty who stole my heart, and gave me hers. We waited until we married to consummate our life together. It was not awkward or tentative, it happened as it was meant to and we connected in a way which elevated our consciousness and bound us to each other.

Our only child was born nine months later, a deliciously pink and heavenly soft little girl.

During the late seventies, the economic situation was very dire in the Industrial area of South Wales where I was born and bred (manipulated by the `brotherhood` in order to implement the next stage of their `Great work` and bring their newest protege, Margaret Thatcher to the fore) . Jobs, were hard to find, the Steelworks and Mines were `downsizing` and my own schooldays had been forcibly curtailed by parents without a steady income. I joined the Royal Air Force in 1978 and a year later, was patrolling the streets of Belfast and Derry with a 7.62mm SLR in my hands.

I omitted to mention that we were wed in 1979. We were twenty one years old.

As the 1970's rolled into the `eighties`, I was still gainfully employed in Her Majesty's Armed Forces. We were the `perfect couple` or so everyone said, and destined for the greatest of things. In 1981, my time in the Airforce was drawaing to a close. My wife wanted to go home, as all Welsh girls do. I had experienced so much in those years since leaving South Wales, and had grown into a strong and vital man, a potential leader of men who really didn't want to go back `home`. I had been advised that futher promotion was very possible, and that my career looked very promising.

But it was not to be. My `Welshgirl` missed her `Mam` and wanted to go home. This was the first tiny schism between us. I liked the Airforce, felt I belonged. I even liked working in Northern Ireland. But, she was my wife so home it was. I joined the Gwent Constabulary in October 1981, and so I can now continue on from paragraph three.

At the Police Training School, I came head to head with `New Woman` and I hated her. Due to my miltary background, I was selected to be `Squad Leader` of the intake, which was made up of approximately 85% male and 15% female recruits. For thirteen weeks, these girls complained, moaned, caused disruption and dissention, fell down during foot drill, cried when they hurt themselves (which they seemed to do often) and flirted unashamedly with fellow recruits and instructors alike, causing several marital ruptures. They caused cliques and divisions which fostered so many problems during those weeks of training. I often wondered why a woman would want to do such a job.

During the same course, I was for the very first time confronted with the beast that is Political `Correction`. Nothing had prepared me for this strange pernicious anomaly. There was none of it in the R.A.F, well at that time anyway, and South Wales was working class, `blue collar` country.

We were given lectures on `women's rights`, `minority rights`, `Inclusiveness` and had the concept of positive discrimination rammed very hard down our collective throats. Now, the thing about blacks is that I grew up with them and amongst them, I had fought alongside then in NI and had never even considered the color difference at all. Jamaicans arriving from the `Commonwealth` at that time, came to the UK searching for a better life, only to be treated shoddily in many cases, and manipulated into race conflict by Marxist Agitators such as Gerry Gable and his `Searchlight` ragmag.

Thirteen weeks later, having successfully completed the course, I felt that overall, I had triumphed against the forces of irrationality. For the next five or six years, the `Feminist Question` and myself had little contact, except through the media.
Like the majority of men, I never noticed it's tentacles creap into every orifice of society. I was much too preoccupied learning my craft, being a father and a husband, providing for my family and living life to take much notice of the political machinations of a few deranged `Plain Janes`. Of couse from time to time, I would sit up and take note of `some woman said this`, on the telly, or `some woman did that`, or the Government has changed this law or that law; well you know, it's something to do with equality !!

In 1986, with little or no warning, my wife and I began to quarrel. This was a new situation. Up until then, life had been as good as it gets. The job was good, we had a great social life, our `angel` was fit and healthy, and, well, there was no one else for either of us. But during her spare evenings when I was not working, she had been taking some courses at the local college. She began to come out with these statements about men, and rights and that there should be more to her life than being a wife and mother. What about her ? You know the story all to well. Within only six months, she was gone, on a `trial basis` she said, along with my sweet little girl. That day, long ago has tainted every other day of my life since.

The divorce was made ugly by a predatory Feminist Lawyer, acting she said on my wife's behalf, and my heart was wrecked. It was difficult to reconcile the woman my daughter's mother had become, with the girlish, brown haired creature of my youth.

The resulting years after that crack in my own belief system and the lies which followed, caused a poisonous rift between my daughter and myself, which has never been repaired. I have two Grand daughters I have never seen. My former wife on the other hand lives nearby to them and sees them every day.

I never saw it coming. I just worked and worked, not through ambition, but necessity. All I seemed to have done since I joined the Air force was work. I was the man, the provider, it was what I was raised to be. Who would have thought it ? At that time, I still didn't understand the extent of the feminist insinuation into the very fibres of my life, but I soon realized there was a monster in my/our midst.

In 1987, having legally battled my `childhood sweetheart` to a stalemate, I decided that a change of location would be the best for all concerned and transferred to the Metropolitan Police in London. As the Capital City of the UK and it's political centre, every imaginable social extreme was highlighted and propagated. By 1989, mostly every `in job` vacancy in the `Force` was filled whenever possible by either a female or `minority`applicant.

During the early part of that year, due to a knee injury sustained playing Rugby, I was temporarily suquested to the Force Recruitment Section. Here, `Affirmative Action` or what was termed in the UK as Positive Discrimination was akin to a religion. Many of the normal requirements for entry were dropped or adjusted, where females and minorities were concerned. We were told that there were `quotas` to be filled, and irrespective of aptitude or suitability, filled they must be. `Access` courses were arranged for `minority applicants` to ensure success in the written aptitude test. I should mention here that the majority of minority applicants I dealt with had no need of these courses, and many objected to being required to attend them. The Medical and Fitness tests were adjusted accordingly to ensure that female candidates would pass these `tests`.

I began to see that fairness and equality was not the name of the game at all. Former members of the armed forces, particularly those with regiment tattoos, or Union Jacks etched into their forearms were to be discouraged, no matter if they were highly suitable, unless they were either female or a minority of course.

Worse still was the level of anti male hostility displayed openly by new female recruits. An attitude conditioned into them by the new and extended training course at the Police College, the contents of which had been politicised to fit the new dogma of the age.

Back to patrol work for only two weeks, I was next sent on a `Sensitivity` course in a North London Polytechnic. This course consisted of a week of thinly veiled Feminist indoctrination, and was `moderated` by two of the most stereotypical `Femi- Marxists` one could imagine. I was, along with most of my colleagues in constant conflict with them, as they attempted to impose their nonsensical ideologies on what was in the main a room filled with men familiar with the realities of life` as Police Officers tend to be.

At work, the `climate` changed ever so gradually, and one became very careful of how one behaved towards female colleagues, and allegations of `harassment` against male officers grew in kind. I myself was repremanded on a number of occasions for the heinous crime of saying, "Good morning girls" and similarly innocent remarks whilst entering offices within the Police Station complex. It was explained to me that some of the female members of staff felt the term `girls` to be demeaning.

To be honest, by the time I injured my back on duty in 1995, I had had enough of the Police Service. It was barely recognisable as the job I had joined fifteen years previously. Still nowhere near the `Strong` arm of the ruling government it resembles today, the writing was most definitely on the wall.

In London at this time, one would not barely even dare to offer one's seat to a woman on a bus or train for fear of being publicly ridiculed as a chauvinist or sexist. Life had most definitely taken a turn for the worse.

The first half of the 1990's was probably the last time that most British women took any pride in their daily appearance, and the incessant wearing of trousers in place of a dress or a skirt was still some years hence. By this time, I had met the dear lady who would become my wife and best friend. She was and still is the saviour of my soul. A lady to the core, soft, lovely and gentle. A woman in the fullest and most wonderful sense of the word. In early 1996, having been retired on ill health, we moved over to her native Denmark.

If my experiences with the `Feminist` were unfortunate in the UK, upon arriving in Denmark, I was confronted by a far more virulent and all embracing model. Feminism is akin to a `State Sponsored` Religion here, and it's tennets are accepted and practiced without question. In fact, so entrenched is it in sciety, it has become the `norm`.

They have achieved a level of androgyny here, that I have not seen elsewhere, although slowly but surely, the whole of Europe is heading that way. One might imagine that many of the women here could have been cloned. They dress the same, behave in the same manner, cut their hair the same, wear the same spectacles, have almost identical opinions about the `Holy Cows` of Danish life (The Welfare State, Education, Health Care and Feminism) and to all intents and purposes, at least superficially, are the same persona. This is a `Hive` and the Queen Bee rules. The extent of feminist ascendancy and male emasculation is more extreme than in other countries I have lived in or visited. It begins in the kindergarten and goes on from there. Boys as boys, girls as boys. These days, whenever I am to be introduced to a Danish `woman`I have not previously met, I form a mental image of what she will look like, and 9 from 10, I am spot on the ball; Short hair, no make up, spectacles, dark coloured baggy clothes and the obligatory pair of ill fitting trousers.

Notwithstanding the above, there is the Media, and the moving image in particular. We have not had a television in our home since 2005. Sometime around 2003, I began to feel very agitated by Hollywood's persistent portrayal of women as `warriors` and `kicking girls` in scenes where small skinny women would be beating the `Devil` out of large muscular men who could in reality, fold them into `Origami figures`. It is now of course near impossible to find a film which excludes these ridiculous themes. As a former 3rd Degree Black Belt in Karate and competitive Kickboxer, I absolutely refute the very possibility of this tripe being the case. In my none too limited experience in the Combat Sports arena, I know categorically that the female is simply unable to generate the kind of explosive force necessary to knock a strong and adrenally pumped man on his backside, except by surprise. I taught Self Defence to women at back in the early 1990's and tell you this, when faced with a violent situation 9.9% of women freeze and panic. This is a fact, it is their nature, and no amount of PC feminist dogma will change it.

Instead of the glaring at the `goggle box`we spend out evenings at home either reading together, or watching a carefully selected movie on our DLP Projector. No more the poisonous viper in the corner of the lounge. Before `losing the tube` when watching young actresses like Alyssa Milano or some of the others who have been portrayed in this aggressive `fight mode` stereotype, I have often wondered at what they themselves think of their roles. Do they believe that they are furthering the plight of the downtrodden woman ? In fifteen years as a Constable, it was my experience that when women stand and fight with men, they get badly hurt. We always taught that for a woman to survive in a confrontation with a man, she must use that element of surprise, hit, then run like hell. Hollywood and it's ilk, are placing women in harm's way, by showing them a fantastical fable so far removed from reality.

But why on earth do women today want so much to be like men ? Of course, it's because of a `cradle to grave` Social Engineering program, making use of all the instruments of information and propaganda available, the Education, Media, and Pop Music factories et al. Feminism is now the unchallenged received wisdom and publicly accepted consensus.

Henry, you and your work, are beacons in the dark. Although we have not met, through reading your articles, I feel I know you well. You have inspired me in so many ways, and I no longer feel alone in a world where all the inalienable truths I know to be real, have been turned on their head by the `Illuminati` Brotherhood of Doom`.

So am I a misogynist ? Well yes and no, but only until some sweet gentle thing, smiles at me, and treats me respectfully as a man and not some virulent anti female disease. Unfortunately, or fortunately for me, that sweet and gentle thing is these days, always my darling wife. For the rest of them, with their short hair, manly clothes, manly ways, and denial of their true nature, I have only loathing and contempt. Not an ounce of compassion or sympathy, for as I approach my fiftieth birthday, they are my enemy, and even though I know and understand that they themselves are but pawns in a deadly game, I cannot help but think that there are those amongst them who do know what they do, and it's consequences, yet persist in doing it, regardless of the cost.

Some years ago, at a University where I was giving a lecture, a typically scruffy looking 24 year old female student began to assail me with the usual feminist rhetoric. She asked me if I was intimidated by a `strong woman`? I said that in nearly fifty years of life, I had not met such a thing. She was confused by this response and seemed bemused that a man had actually something to say for himself. She then engaged me in argument, a situation which by nature, I relish. For the next hour, I verbally `drilled` her into her seat as I unleashed years of pent up anguish and recently acquired knowledge. At the end, she was white like a sheet and I could see that her own belief system had been if not crushed, severely damaged. She knew nothing of Betty Friedan, nor Gloria Steinberg, nor even Margaret Sanger. She knew not where her instilled ideology originated, that it was via the CIA and Communist agitative idealogues, bought and payed for by moneyed elites such as the Rockefeller's and Rothschilds, and that beyond them, something far more sinister lurked.

I told her about the `girl` soldiers in Iraq, with their dislocated joints and other strains caused by doing a job women were never intended to do. About Women Police Sergeants crying on the streets of London whilst being tossed around like a rag dolls, until a male colleague arrives to `save` her. Of Women Fire fighters being unable to carry a body from a burning building due to inadequate strength, employed only on the basis of their gender.

I'm not sure whether what I said stuck, or whether the inevitable reinforcing of dogma through her University `professors` will have erased my tirade from her memory. I somehow doubt that as I am not easily dismissed. My challenge to speak to her class, or debate with her teachers in open forum was was not taken up.

So maybe I am only a discriminating misogynist. A female counselor for the Police during an annual evaluation once said to me that I suffered from a `Sir Galahad` complex and that I was only able to relate to attractive women. I told her that it was more likely a `Sir Lancelot` complex as the former was the perfect Knight, and that I was most certainly not that.

As I mentioned earlier, this month, I attain the half century mark of life on Planet Earth. In my whole life, I have `known` only four women, two of which have been wives. I have never had a casual sexual experience, nor a `one night` stand, never been unfaithful, and have loved each of those four women with all that I am, none more so than my dearest wife of these past eight years, who I pray I will share the remainder of my days with.

I hope that my ramblings have not been too disjointed, I just felt the need to tell you something of the man you have often corresponded with, but never met, and who admires and regards you and thinks of you as a friend. I am honored to know you and praise your courage and conviction, for it is you above all the others who has dared to lock horns with the beast of all beasts, that most destructive and vicious of weapons used to demoralize and deconstruct all that is is good and true in humanity.


"Whatever became of Sweet Guinevere" ?

Anonymous said...

Excellent post Duncan, you have hit that proverbial nail again.

It is that all too common duality I feel when I read it though, I love the fact you are exposing these ludicrous Government practices, but hate the fact that you have to in the first place!

Anonymous said...

Link which discusses and shows pictures of Eliot Spitzer's whore. Would you pay $1,000 US an hour to prong this bitch? Spitzer's "progressive" politics must also be related to myopia.

Anonymous said...

Do what I did. Leave the country.

Best decision I ever made.

Anonymous said...

Please read this story of three pathetic manginas who became "househusbands" and were dumped by their bitchy, career wives after raising the children.

The article readily admits that women have no respect for men who do not wear the pants in the relationship.

Anonymous said...

More pathetic rubbish from a pack of fairies and dickless wonders.

Anonymous said...

Every budget and chancellor is the same.Different face,same shite.Tax the shite out of petrol,fags and booze then surprise surprise, this happens-suplicating themselves in front of the champing left loving pussworshiping fem-monsters and practically throwing money at them,their welps, and their hair-brained schemes and initiatives.

Last person leaving Britain,please turn out the lights.

Martin said...

Duncan: RE boozing. How often do you hear "wimmin" whine on about making pubs more "wooman friendly?"

I had to laugh when some landlord emailed into Radio 5 the other day saying "oh yes women, they sit there for 2 hours yaking to their mates and in that time consume a small mineral water and a lettuce sandwich..."

You're not going to make a busines out of that are you?

As for the child benefit thing, some doepy cow was on the radio the other day (a single mother of course) she had 3 kids by 3 different men, one was 18, one was 9 and one was 3)

Just look at the age span. Always one at junior school so she doesn't have to get off her fat arse and get a job. A bet as soon at the youngest goes to school there will be a 4th on the day.

They should be taxing the cunts that breed.

Having said that, I will be better off this budget as I drive a company car so don't pay car tax and I get my fuel costs back. So with the 2% drop in the basic rate of tax (paid for by the poor - cheers lads) I'm going ot be better off by about £600 a year.

Great news for me. I might even vote Labour if they screw the poor working class even more like that again.

Anonymous said...

Great post Duncan,

Only further illustrates the insanity that feminism and political correctness has foisted upon us all! Here in the states where I live, there is absolutely no opposition to feminism what so ever. I can understand how a man could go crazy; here is a small sample of what we are dealing with on the other side of the pond.

Conservative talk show hosts on the television and radio that are politically correct feminists, and yes, they all are!

“Conservatives” here holding Margaret Thatcher, a feminist, (as are all women in positions of power) and Ronald Reagan (who kowtowed to the feminists and made Sandra Day O’Conner a Supreme Court justice) as conservative heroes?

“Conservative” talk show hosts who, when the subject of the Middle East comes up, will invariably shift the subject over to the plight of Middle Eastern women, playing the feminist card and droning on and on about how horrible Middle Eastern men treat women, but will never address the destruction that 40 plus years of feminism has caused western societies?

60 year old “Christian conservative” men that argue that you only reason you are against anti-male, anti-family feminists who pretend to be “pro-family conservatives” such as Dr Laura is because you are jealous of them because “they have a better job than you?” (Yes, the old feminist cocksucker actually said that!)

“Conservatives” like Dr Laura who preach abstinence before marriage, and portray pre-marital sex as immoral (Even though this bitch did it herself) but display the very attitude in a woman that’s the reason why men no longer want to get married to begin with!

“Anti-feminist" bloggers who are really feminists and argue that men are better at being mothers to children than women and could just as well sit at home and play mommy to the kids as their feminist, career counterparts?

My left wing boss (Another old guy by the way) where I work spreading the old tired feminist lie that girls do better in single sex schools than coed schools where the mean, nasty, boys can’t dominate the environment and infringe on the poor girls learning, but of course with out addressing why the boys are doing more poorly in school than girls on average?

Your typical modern feminist husband who thinks it’s just wonderful that his high-powered feminist career wife out earns him, but doesn’t stop to think why he doesn’t have a better job? All the while the feminists still spreading the “women earn .75 cents to every dollar a man earns,” lie?

No talent females earning big money doing jobs that they were never qualified to have to begin with, (I know such a few) while more educated, qualified men are often lucky to find a decent job at all?

In short, every source of media be it radio, anything on television ect, is tainted by feminism, magazines such as outdoors men’s magazines like Field And Stream are now feminist and PC for Christ’s sake!

These are just a few of the many thousands of examples I could give, in short, we’re fucked over here! This thinking is so ingrained in the average Americans mind that unless you make a conscious effort to not be a feminist you are one with out even realizing it! Short of the WW2 generation who are now mostly gone everyone here, male or female (With extremely rare exception!), is a feminist!

The only way I can see it ever going away is if the economies of the Western Powers collapse, which the way things are going may not be too far off!

Captain Zarmband said...

I'm a businessman myself and as such I can give some practical advice to any women wanting to join the business world - get off your arse and do it yourself. If you need government hand outs to get started then you don't have what it takes to keep a business going. That's the simple truth folks. This is why 90% of businesses fail within the first two years. People think it's easy and have no idea how tough you have to be to be successful. You'll have years where you work like hell and still make a loss. Many people can't cope with this and pack it in.

If women need taxpayer hand outs to get into business then they don't have what it takes for that business to have any longevity and this means the money that taxpayer spends is largely wasted.

By the way, there are some successful women in business but generally speaking women don't like the risks and long hours for little reward that running a business requires. This is their choice and nothing to do with discrimmination.

Will said...

Great site!

Anonymous said...

Captain Zarmband,

Women have a magical ideal of what a business is. They think it is a bunch of men in a room smoking cigars drinking some brandy and signing pieces of paper that magically make money appear. Boy, aren't they surprised that, that is absolutely NOT how it happens. What is more amazing is the complete lack of being ready to "take it like a man" when they find out how much backstabbing and wrangling goes on inorder to get business contracts and keep them. It's a fucking warzone yet if these harpies aren't involved in that these feminst infected harpies would think their man deserves a warzone to come home to as well. What a bunch of hen-like CUNTS for doing that. But then agian that is what they wanted to begin with, everything to be about themselves and only themselves. Hope modern women enjoy the cats, i'm certainly enjoying investing in companies that deal in cat products.

Anonymous said...

“Please read this story of three pathetic manginas who became "househusbands" and were dumped by their bitchy, career wives after raising the children”.

“More pathetic rubbish from a pack of fairies and dickless wonders”.

Sage comments of course! There is nothing more pathetic than a man who has sacrificed his balls to the feminist alter and then becomes a mangina house husband (Women in a mans body) while his feminist career wife (Man in a woman’s body) goes out and supports his oh so pathetic, sorry ass. Nothing could be further from what nature intended!

Who knows, maybe when no one is looking he even lets the kiddies nurse from his teats?

Anonymous said...

I think that most of the problem that men face in today's society is that they are still clinging to old and obsolete concepts, such as marriage, family , paternity and chivalry.

Cast those outdated "ideals" (that made slaves out of men) and choose a lifestyle that fits your own needs.
What used to be seen as a vice has become a cherished quality: for instance , selfishness and hedonism have been decried during the Victorian era. All that did was to maintains men in a perpetual state of slavery.

Now Men are free. The old lifestyle is just like a snake's skin that has come off to let the new skin shine.

Women have been put on a pedestal for centuries and we were too blind to see them in their real light. At long last, we all know that women are not what we were taught they were: our eyes have opened as they should also open upon the real face of our society. Personally, I p*ss upon society: I take what I need from it. Society is my hunting ground: game is plentiful.

Selfishness is a nice virtue, believe me. And so is hedonism.

Just think that we have been pulled out of nothingness to spend a few years on this earth, only to return to nothingness.
When you really start thinking about it, nothing is important, except the pleasures we take or steal while we are alive.
In the end, nothing matters. Carpe Diem.


Mike Hunter said...

"If you readers of this humble blog will excuse me, I'm off to drink a load of Victory Gin and then I'm going to lean out of my bedroom window and shake my fist in the general direction of Westminster whilst shouting "Cocksuckers!" until I either pass-out on the window-ledge or a neighbour calls the police, whichever conclusion to the night occurs soonest."

LOL! Pure gold!

Perseus said...

I would like to introduce a new word into the english language.
I think you can figure out what it means. I would like to consider myself the first man in the western world to call him self a nonogamist.

My little place in history.

Anonymous said...

It's not quite as bad as this in the US - yet.

B.R. said...

Congrats on some eloquent posts, guys. I can't really say it any better.

Only thing I can add at the moment is to chime in and say that I definitely feel it here in the U.S. as well. They haven't achieved the uniformity of appearance that one respondent mentioned, but the attitude is there in droves, male or female.

Signs of a "women-first" culture hit me in the face everywhere I look, but no one else seems to notice or care (I know it's not true, just the way it feels out there). I was at the library the other day, and it seemed like half the notices on their bulletin board were female oriented, such as a "Mother-daughter reading club", and the posters of famous people saying "read" near me were of females also. When I look in the community events and groups listings in the local paper, it's women's this and girlpower that, V-day this and estrogen that. And if you complain, you must hate women (and it's frequently a "man" leveling that accusation at you).

It gets me down sometimes. I try to live in a way that doesn't compromise or sell out the way most guys have just to get laid, try to avoid giving women any free rides or pussy passes, try to treat them with equality in full measure rather than just the bits they approve of, but I just get frustrated sometimes. The thugs keep getting laid, the skanks still trip along blithely unaware of reality due to being protected from it by manginas, and I just keep getting older, without life experiences that others take for granted. I'm not giving up, I'm just tired, and it's something I struggle with. I'm in a new place, trying to lead a new and better life, trying to think more positively, but sometimes I'm faced with the same old garbage, and it gets to me. I'm not even sure what my point is anymore, just thinking out loud.

In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man isn't necessarily king, but at least he knows what's going on, and sees things for what they are.

Anyways, keep up the good posts, I appreciate being able to come here and see at least a little sanity in a really messed up world.

mandy said...

Phillip, you asked "Whatever became of Sweet Guinevere?"

She never was truly sweet but she sure pulled the wool over other's eyes in that regard. She was an adultress pursuing her lusts (aka "true love") and Lancelot was a backstabber.

Old fashioned Chivalry was an offshoot of the medieval troubadors who wrote poetry about the illicit 'love' between married upper class women and knights. This was high entertainment at the time because they presented exciting stories that differed from reality. A brave strong warrior knight would swoon and fall apart the sight of his beloved handkerchief. In reality, he would to f--- her but this wasn't as entertaining. All those 'ladies first', holding doors open social graces are an offshoot of this dramatized idolization of women. And Hollywood has cashed in now.

At some point, people decided this dramatized infatuation was really 'true love' and should be the basis of not just marriage, but of living your life (if you desire someone, it doesn't matter that they are no good for you, married or that you may be married, just go for it!) And so we have easy, common divorce.

There was a time when infatuation and an individuals desires were not the sole basis of marriage. Marriages lasted longer and were stable, they represented a true partnership as opposed to something to make someone happy until they change their mind and want a different partner or living situation.

Anonymous said...

Equality law could bar white men from jobs


'lol, but this aint no fucking joke gentlemen -

either decent young white men stand up against this bitch, and her likes, or gender aparheid will happen. Make no mistake, it already is happening.

Perhaps the BNP is the only political party that will fight back, and i don't think anyone really wants that to happen. Remember one of the last times a party like that took control of the minds of its young males? - Hitler and the Nazis in Germany in the mid 1930's

Harriet Harman et al are so far up their PC arses, they can't see the real World out there.

wrong. Harriet Harman knows exactly what she is doing. She is on a mission to destroy men, as are most polictical partys in femostate britain. Manginas like brown, cameron and clegg are manipulated by the femo-agenda and either dont know about it or couldn't give a shit. They think they are immune, above the ordinary man, as they are members of a political elite. Same goes for all men involved in the mass media.

likewise, as someone already pointed out - running to femo-australia won't help the average man out much, if anything the persecution of the white male is even worse over there. Forget canada, and the US too.

the only answer to this, is too start speaking up against these people. The ideology that women should be entitled to things because they are women is flawed, and it was flawed when it began.

the answer, is for men to start being men again, stop pretending that women are somehow 'equal' to us. Every single real man here knows deep down how desperately inferior women are in every sense. The ones who say they don't believe that, are lying manipulation mangina men who get fucked over by every women they ever meet. They actually believe that by being nice to women they will somehow get into their knickers. lol.

harman and her like had their chance to be 'equal' and they used it to try and achieve dominance. They are at best a poor mans saddam hussain, but even so, they need to be stopped. Harman and the feminazi corportation have got into power based only on having an axe to grind about their inferior biology and let me remind all men here, that they care nothing about men, nothing about equalty and nothing about merit. They are the enemy of equality, men, me, you and every other white fucker in this website, the next website, the bloke walking down the street or the one drinking a pint in the local boozer.

they control the entire state, and all its media. the british broadcastrating corporashit long since fell under their control.

Harman and her likes want to label everything according to race and gender. So, lets play her game and stop being ashamed of what we the white males have achieved. Feminists and manginas have spent the last 50 years trying to destroy the identity of white men, and white men have let it happen. However let's remember, that we have built every leading civilisation in the world today. a question, What exactly, has mrs harman and her band of femanazis ever done for society, and more importantly, what has this pathetic femostate ever done for YOU, a man?

its simple, fuck all.. so, they deserve.. fuck all. In a decent honest mans world, you EARN what you get, you dont get it through bitching and whinging about how awful men are.

these people need to be fought on every ground they stand on. Female entitlement stops here, and now. Blokes need to stop pissing around, and start being the boss again. These femofrauds have long since had their chance, and they do nothing accept whinge and demand more from white men.

no fucking around. it needs to stop here.'

Anonymous said...

You know,this really happened and I'm not joking.A friend of mine runs half and full marathons.There is a half marathon coming up soon and he went round his place of work with his sponser form (o.k. it's some poncy office and 80-90% of the work force are flappin' cunt-lips but that's not the point)

His charity? Prostate cancer awareness.The few guys there promptly signed his form and promised a few quid.But here's the rub. All,and Imean all of the women/girls thought it was a scream.They laughed,joked,winked and nudged each other and outright told him no, he would only get sponsers if he was running for breast-cancer etc.And my friend was shaking with rage.He was almost crying with anger when he related his story to me.
He went to the boss,told him what happened and was basically told that it's up to them if they choose to sponser him.No reprimand to the fat bitches,no scolding,no warnings,nothing.


sORRY ABOUT THE CAPS THERE.My pal Gus no longer works there.He's had it up to his neck and got a job landscaping gardens.Needledd tosay,all his workmates are men and brand new,every one.And yes,they all sponsored him.

Anonymous said...

"Perhaps the BNP is the only political party that will fight back, and i don't think anyone really wants that to happen. Remember one of the last times a party like that took control of the minds of its young males? - Hitler and the Nazis in Germany in the mid 1930's."

The BNP is not a Nazi party, it is a British nationalist and traditionalist party. The BNP is also the only political party in the UK to stand up to Political Correctness and feminism. Vote BNP and you will see real, positive change in the UK.

Anonymous said...

Feminism is such a hypocritical philosophy – one that contains both the false victimhood of imagined sexism; combined with attempts to cling to the entitlements of both traditional and progressive gender roles – that it's sometimes hard to take it seriously.

Outside of politics and the courtroom, feminism doesn't really exist. Most women don't even want to use the label out of terror some man might call her on it and make her pay her way. Hell, feminism is a product of chivalry. Of white men bending over backwards to protect women so they'll feel like "equals". This doesn't exist in most other cultures and thanks to GW Bush and the world resenting our presence in Iraq, Imperialism forcing such values on other countries is now largely over.

Hmh said...

Something I'd just heard in passing today: apparently there's a law in the USA demanding 50-50 representation across the board on sports participation and course enrolments at college. They're actually achieving this... but only by shutting down every course and every team or sport that's male-dominated. The female-dominated ones are fine of course.

This is actually beyond parody. How the hell do you make fun of something this stupid? Someone, someone out there - please tell me that this is just a malicious rumour!!

Anonymous said...

I do not feel that the situation in America is at all over exaggerated!

Jog your memories and think back fellow Americans!

Does any besides myself remember that shortly after 911, the conservatives (And I use that term loosely) on Fox news and on the radio were putting out just about every other news report to the effect of, “How women were treated under the Taliban,” While of course not mentioning the fact that far more men were brutalized and murdered under the Taliban than women! These phonies used this tragedy to advance their feminist agenda!

Any here remember Laura Bush’s feminist radio address? Again highlighting the horrors of life for women under the Taliban while making no mention of the abuses the men suffered?

Anyone remember when the kid from Marin CA (John Walker Jr was his name I believe?) was caught fighting for the Taliban, the first comment out of George Bush, several other politicians and the so called “conservatives” was something to the effect of “I can not believe that this guy would fight for an enemy that believes that women do not deserve any rights,” the responses were almost identical from all of the above!

I would have thought that the response of “I cannot believe that this guy would fight for an enemy who murdered 3000 plus innocent civilians during 911” would have been a more appropriate response myself?

Any remember when George Bush made Condi Rice Sec of state and the “conservatives” on the radio and Fox news were just “chomping at the bit” to put Condi up against Hillary in 08? Did you notice that the reaction was not the same when Colin Powell was made Sec of state? These are both black candidates for those of you on the other side of the pond who may be unfamiliar with who I am speaking of, in other words, the “feminist card” triumphs the “race card” here in the states and is indeed the most powerful of the left wing movements. The Fags (Not the kind you smoke mates) are a close second!

No my fellow Americans, the situation here is not so exaggerated!

Woman With A Question said...

"The BNP is not a Nazi party, it is a British nationalist and traditionalist party. The BNP is also the only political party in the UK to stand up to Political Correctness and feminism. Vote BNP and you will see real, positive change in the UK."

Ok, now I will take off my antagonistic hat and ask a serious question. Not looking for a fight, but your opinion and others who may agree with you here. I am a bit familiar with the BNP. It does seem rather close to nazism. So I would ask, for whom would the positive changes be in favor of?

One thing that I can say that is so great about the United States rather than Europe, the right wing conservatives here are not necessarily nazis or racists. They challenge polarizing racial quotas in favor of minorities (rightfully so), but not people. It appears that Europeans are unable to separate conservatism from racism or xenophobia in general. Just a thought.

Captain Zarmband said...

The comments made by your earlier contributor about his friend seeking sponsorship for the prostate cancer charity and the refusal of females to support his efforts, is extremely enlightening. I've commented on this myself and it shows just how selfish modern females can be. They will only contribute to something that benefits them, i.e. females, so anything that doesn't affect them doesn't concern them. In my experience the only women who show any concern about prostate cancer, testicular cancer, and other male-only illnesses, are those women who've actually lost a male relative to the illness. And even then their main focus often revolves around the loss of their "breadwinner". Men, on the other hand, will freely donate to women-only charities without any qualms. This shows which gender is the most selfish.

Oh, and by the way, the next time you see women collecting for charity I'll bet you it's some breast cancer/cervical cancer, women-only organisation.

Anonymous said...

Good in depth comment Phillip.
I've been through similar and the pain shows through every word.
It does ease but never goes away.
That's us men !
Soft NO - but Caring Yes!
As to the Harm-men strategy - recent press reports tell us that the proposed Co-habit laws ,(Marriage-Lite), are being quietly dropped from the law making she-genda.
Reason -Cost ??
Yeah everyone was asking Whaaaat cost,where. £££££££....Zzzzz
No..the real 'cost' would be a humungous negative population growth rate for indigenous peoples not into mir-ri-age anymore and having absolutely no alternative like co-habiting available.
(Thankz for the publicity Macca !!)
We already have 2- 3 million cheap labour imports into the UK who have taken 90% of the going jobs and that cannot be sustained on cultural grounds-let alone economic.
They will all bring dependants over later when citizenship is granted.
NB: I don't blame the incomers -I would do the same thing in their shoes!
People like Harm-men and her greasy cohorts are blind to the morality of their pronouncements/legislation -but not totally stupid as to the effects -as commented earlier here.
Feminazm beginning to hit the buffers??
PS Don't forget the English Democratic Party is an option for rational change! 5K

Martin said...

RE the comments about Prostate Cancer. This is nothing new. About 90% of the NHS budget and charities that deal in Cancer spend thier money on female dominated cancers.

I find it quite interesting that there are these "wimmin" only races allowed. What don't they think men care about cancer either?

It's well known in the UK that if men put the same demand on the NHS as women it would collapse overnight.

I've also read that men are turned away for registering with an NHS doctor whilst women are accepted.

long-gone said...

Woman with a question said...
"One thing that I can say that is so great about the United States rather than Europe, the right wing conservatives here are not necessarily nazis or racists."

That'll soon change if Obama gets elected.

'A Brief for Whitey'.

More welfare and affirmative action will just lead to even more of this.

Woman With An Opinion said...

long-gone said...

Woman with a question said...
"One thing that I can say that is so great about the United States rather than Europe, the right wing conservatives here are not necessarily nazis or racists."

That'll soon change if Obama gets elected.

'A Brief for Whitey'.

More welfare and affirmative action will just lead to even more of this.

24 March 2008 03:09

I won't get into this type of discussion on this blog as it may be branded off topic. But feel free to stop by my blog if you'd like to argue about this (my latest post is on Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the unfair criticism he and Obama receives).