Saturday, 16 February 2008

Sunday afternoon humour



From Big Train, a sketch show from a few years back.

Imagine how great it would it be if a genuine chatshow host sang such a song to a genuine feminist on live TV.

And from the same show, here's an extreme, pre-emptive and completely insane method of terrorising people into never daring to criticise your unmarried status.

38 comments:

Anonymous said...

http://misformalevolent.blogspot.com/2005/08/is-for-alimony-part-ii-or-why-alimony.html

Alimony is wrong.
Note that I don’t phrase this as a question – this isn’t a game show, although many men are in ‘jeopardy’. Still, for many, it is a question – some people just don’t 'get' that anything could be wrong with the concept or execution of alimony. In fact many consider it misogynous to verbalize the idea that alimony might be wrong. Once, when I commented that my well-compensated ex should just get on with her life, one of my lawyers said: “All men say that.” No tiptoeing around PC language like; ‘higher wage earner’, no, my lawyer said it the way it is – men pay alimony and women collect it, and men don’t like it. But let’s get to the point of my post – that Alimony Is Wrong. That Alimony is Wrong needs to be explained to the world, in very simple language that can be understood by all. So, getting to it:

Alimony Is Wrong Because:
Alimony is a form of slavery: If you get divorced, earn more than your ex spouse, are a man and get a divorce you will be paying a significant portion of your income to her against your will for years – without the choice to change careers and earn less (oh, you can change careers, but the courts will ‘impute’ your prior income to you and take the alimony out of your salary before it hits your bank account). This is slavery. Wikipedia defines slavery as follows: “Slavery is a condition of control over a person, known as a slave, against his or her will, enforced by violence or other forms of coercion. Slavery almost always occurs for the purpose of securing the labor of the slave.” It goes on to note that ‘Chattel Slavery’ is a specific form where the slaves can be bought and sold. So short of being bought and sold, alimony makes men slaves. The Constitution’s Thirteenth Amendment has the following to say on slavery: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Very simply, Alimony is Slavery, and against the human rights specified in the Constitution of the United States.

Alimony is Involuntary Servitude: The Department of Justice notes on involuntary servitude that US Code specifies that it is “unlawful to hold a person in a condition of slavery, that is, a condition of compulsory service or labor against his/her will.”, and further requires as a definition of Involuntary Servitude: “that the victim be held against his/her will by actual force, threats of force, or threats of legal coercion”. They continue to note that the US Code “[…]prohibits compelling a person to work against his/her will by creating a ‘climate of fear’ through the use of force, the threat of force, or the threat of legal coercion.” They couldn’t have described the process of enforcing alimony and child support better if they had put their mind to it. -Title 18 USC Section 1584

Alimony and Child Support are “Debt Servitude” or “Peonage”: A debt is the requirement that an individual pay a sum of money, and tying this debt to labor that you require an individual to undertake in order to pay off this sum is peonage under the US Code. When a court in addition imputes a man’s income, attaches to his wages, and takes more than 10% of his income (65% being what the court is allowed to take in NJ), without recourse being allowed to bankruptcy, it becomes an even more obvious. Clearly Alimony is Debt Servitude/Peonage. -Title 18 USC Section 1581


Divorce Agreements Specifying Alimony are Unconscionable Contracts: An unconscionable contract is a contract that is “so unfair to a party that no reasonable or informed person would agree to it.” Clearly any contract that reduces one party to involuntary servitude or debt servitude must be considered unconscionable. To prove this, lawyers usually try to prove that the contract was signed under duress, undue influence, or unconscionable bargaining. Duress includes threats of imprisonment (hmm, sounds familiar) and threats of withholding or taking money or goods in exchange for payments or signatures (this is also a pervasive element of divorce). Undue Influence seems moot in a court system where the Judges are trained to ignore men's rights, and men are assumed to need to pay. I think it is fair to presume that undue influence is present in alimony, because the man really has no choice but to sign the divorce contract. Unconscionable Bargaining is where one party did not understand the consequence of signing the contract. Mostly at the divorce agreement stage, men understand too well, but have no choice (duress) – but their fate was sealed at another signature point – the marriage contract signing point. I think it is fair to argue that men paying alimony in general did not understand the implications of marriage when they got married, and in most cases would not have done so if they had known the very real and mechanical outcome of the failure of their marriage. In this way, a foundational agreement that is presumed in the divorce agreement is a product of unconscionable bargaining. So in several ways, divorce agreements specifying alimony are unconscionable contracts.

Alimony is Chauvinist in Effect – Discriminatory Against Men: The vastly overwhelming majority of alimony-payers are men, and it is well known and admitted that divorce laws relating to alimony and division of property are applied differently depending on who the sex of the higher wage-earner is. This is against our guarantee of equal rights in the constitution.




CHAOS in India:

Women are using anti-dowry laws to imprison men. Are dowry is an essential part of every healthy marriage.
http://batteredmale.blogspot.com/
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-Y2MTaSA0RLDVTunp3KQgKh0-
http://my2cents.rediffblogs.com/
http://vinayak123.spaces.live.com/


Now the indians are suffering, too.

Anonymous said...

The last guy is clinically insane.

darkbhudda said...

Love Big Train.

Reminds me a little of Micallef's take on racism and humour

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lygCpysbybo

Anonymous said...

>>The last guy is clinically insane.

Argumentum ad hominem.

Anonymous said...

Looks like they've updated the misandric knifeblock:

http://tinyurl.com/yr5o2x

Anonymous said...

I only watched the first video in its entirety. The song if from ‘My Fair Lady’ and so I suppose must be at least 40 years old; though I expect the sentiment expressed goes back very much further. I am not sure the sketched really worked. The actors looked a little ill at easy. Men singing songs about how logical they are in a sort of way making themselves look a little ridiculous. As an idea I am not even sure the notion is true, or if it is true then it is only a shallow description. There is nothing ‘logical’ in say supporting a particular football team – there is no reason why it should be logical. Yet many men are very much dominated by a devotion to ‘their’ team. Similarly there is nothing ‘logical’ in a grate painting, or if there is that is not what makes it grate. Again men have produced such things.

I think men are logical but that does not describe their entirety. They are also not universally logical. If that were the case then they would never disagree amongst themselves, and we all know they disagree all the time. Where male logic triumphs is as machine builders and constructors of all types. Without male thinking I very much doubt there would have ever been even steam engines.

I suppose I object to seeing maleness confined to only one thing. Logical – yes sometimes – but also inventive, emotional, passionate, obstinate and the list goes on.

Anonymous said...

Overweight woman refuses proposal. Maybe the ring was not big enough.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1709142

Anonymous said...

http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/the_way_we_live/article3345831.ece

After the class, I inquired after the woman. She was, as I suspected, a Merc Mother. Married to a film producer and with slews of domestic help, she is part of a burgeoning class of women who neither work nor raise children. It is a group unrepresented in the “war of the mothers” (working v stay-at-home mothers), or any other war for that matter. They can’t beat their chest for the sacrifices made in the name of raising a family (because they haven’t), nor can they claim to have suffered for feminism (because they ditched the day job as soon as they got hitched). They simply fall into a big societal crack.

Anonymous said...

I could only read a little bit of it before I puked. As I sit here with about fifteen programming books on my desk & related technology, along with a programming ebook open on my desktop. Yet, "boys" just don't use teh internetz! Is da empowered grrls domain!

Sorry, Boys, This Is Our Domain
http://tinyurl.com/2d542y

Anonymous said...

Do you guys think this is real?

Female Misogynist
http://malechauvinist.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

Single women are championing madatory marriage for men but the right to divorce for women.

http://themensview.blogspot.com/2007/10/marriage-mandate-crowd.html

Lately, the Marriage Mandaters have shown their hand and admitted that they approve of divorce when it is the woman's decision. They also admit that women should only settle for men who are successful and willing to support a family on one salary alone. In other words, women have the option to be traditional or progressive while men must be obedient worker drones.


http://manyluxuryvacations.blogspot.com/
They want men who will provide for them in luxury and give them children - while reserving the right to divorce at any time.




I think people get the picture more and more. Women want desperately a husband because they hate being forced to work like a man.

Anonymous said...

Ugly woman wants to be treated like a queen:
http://toronto.craigslist.ca/tor/w4m/583116225.html

First, I'm a beautiful woman. I get told that a lot. A LOT! Men are intimidated by my looks.

I'm a BBW but I prefer slim, educated, professional men. You must have your own place as I share an apartment with someone and I don't like hosting.

Only white men please. I'm editing this to add that I love the finer things in live. Be prepared to treat me like the Queen I am.

Anonymous said...

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/fashion/21webgirls.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

the man bashing continues.

men using the internet: misfits
women using the internet: digitally
effusive


All these girls creating something are actually doing pretty simple work. It has nothing at all to do with prograamming which requires thought, experience and precision.

Anonymous said...

Women need marriage more than men do. They rebelled against it, but nature strikes back and women long for a husband.
While they claimed that marriage was oppression, now they demand that men get coaxed into marriage - for th egood of women. No kidding, this is the illogical logic of women.

http://www.americanwomensuck.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=12539

Anonymous said...

Marriage is oppression and women need men like fish need bicycles.
Now women complain about a lack of men willing to marry and what to do to get married. Poor sob understood a bit late that the career was no career at all but some boring job.


Why There Are No Good Men Left: The Romantic Plight of the New Single Woman
http://www.amazon.com/Why-There-Are-Good-Left/dp/0767906403/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203777051&sr=8-1

This woman "embodies a new model of success based on educational and professional achievement," but, says Whitehead, the choices she makes in her 20s and 30s sometimes make finding a mate difficult.

Yes, indeed waiting until 30 to get married is a bad choice for a woman in itself.

She points out that women are putting off marriage until they have accomplished career goals, which leads to not only a later median age for first marriages but also an entirely new set of rules for dating.

Who ever had accomplished his career goals at 30? A career ends at 50, not at 30.
Further proof that women never really understood what career really meant.

And the dating rules have never changed: young fertile woman attracts good provider.

Poor sobs!

Anonymous said...

It seems difficult to demand that girls be virgins at the time of their marriage, when one knows that most marry far too late. the solution to this very modern problem is simple: get married when you feel the first urge to have sex.
Indeed most girls have sex at 14 in the UK and many are avid collectors of STDs a few years later.
So why aren't they married at 14 when they have sex at 14 and when having sex is even encouraged by the government programms which give out condoms?

It is obvious that a girl who cn have sex can also be married.

Being a virgin is essential for being a good wife. Reproduction is a woman's task during marriage, so men want a wife who is fit for reproduction, which means no STDs, no children of other men.

Young women whore themselves through their youth and then they complain. Cry me a river!

Anonymous said...

Life for young women gifted with beauty could be so easy. They could marry at 16, have many children, cook for their husband and be happy. At 40 most of them would be grandmothers.

Life could be easy really easy for them and rewarding.

Instead the young women who are gifted with natural beauty whore when they are young. The get STDs, abortions, they have many sex partners, they co-habit, and they age. When they are 26-36 they desperately want a husband.

Many of them are single mothers.


One gets the impression that young women are uncapable of making the right decision themselves that they have to be coerced by their parents into marriage. That may explain why so many cultures used arranged marriages.


It is shocking that beautiful women who could have a good life, choose the path of sluts instead.

Anonymous said...

Keeley Hazel is such a woman gifted with great natural beauty and big natural breasts. Instead of getting married when she was 16 she participated in a beauty contest - how pathetic.

Now people can watch a sex tape of her and she showing herself nude in many newspapers. She is 21, photos of her when she was 18 are much more beautiful. If she waits any longer, she will age, too, and find no husband.


If a woman is not married at 18-23, she does have a mental problem. This problem might be due to social engineering, but it is a mental problem without a doubt.

Anonymous said...

At 6 pm I saw several cuties. They were between 14 and 16 and dressed in a way to attract men's looks.

it is the age where women instinctively do what they can to attract men. Sadly they attract and are attracted to the bad boys. I have seen real whores waiting for customers who were more modestly dressed than these 14yo girls who go out this evening. many of them are no virgins anymore and these days even 14yo carry STDs.

Sure, they seem to be happy, smile constantly, but in just a few years, their happiness will be replaced by sadness and "the thousand cock stare".

It is surprising but 20yo women do not at all seem to be happy these days.

I saw a mother pushing her 1yo child in a cart: she was full of riddles, certainly smoke and her hips were much too thin.
having such a mother is equal to child mistreatment.

Women today are unfit to be mothers and our wives.

Anonymous said...

Do not marry women in a country that does not respect your rights, that includes FOREIGN women.

http://mensnewsdaily.com/author/carey-roberts/

One came from Sean Moffett of St. Paul, Minn. whose wife is from Guatemala. Soon after the wedding he discovered to his dismay that her real aim was different from what she had pledged in her wedding vows.

This is his story:

My wife’s family came to visit for a few months and they repeatedly attempted to provoke confrontations between my wife and me. Ultimately, my wife assaulted me by punching me in the neck. I did not hit my wife back or abuse her in any way.

I was arrested for 5th Degree Domestic Assault and spent three days in jail for a crime I did not commit and for not leaving my home under duress. While I was behind bars, my wife cleaned out the joint bank account.

I later learned that a legal aide group called Civil Society Helps had assisted with my wife’s abuse claims to expedite her immigration application. This outfit helps many immigrant women to file false abuse claims under the Violence Against Women Act.

Shortly after my release from jail, my wife asked me to write a letter to immigration stating I was an abusive husband. She promised if I wrote the letter she would help me get my home back.

Instead of allowing myself to be blackmailed, I wrote the Citizenship and Immigration Service to withdraw the petition for my wife’s U.S. residency. I used my last credit card to retain a lawyer to petition for divorce. At that point I was broke, homeless, and sleeping in my car and under my desk at the office.

The courts later granted my wife all of the marital property and ordered that I surrender to her a car that was titled in my name. To add insult to injury, the judge granted her a one year Order for Protection.

She then telephoned me several times, calling me an “ABUSER” real slow and sarcastically. Knowing how groups like the Civil Society work, I can only imagine how they coached my wife.

Several times my wife has been confronted by the Eagan, Minn. police for driving without a license. She was repeatedly given a warning, yet continued to drive the vehicle.

Later, I spoke with one of the officers and reminded him it is against the law for anyone to drive a motor vehicle without a license or insurance. His partner threatened to arrest me for allegedly creating a public disturbance. But I had done nothing wrong and they backed off when I informed them I had a witness looking on.

Last year I earned a very high salary, lived in a house by a lake, and enjoyed life as much as I could with a wife who didn’t love me. At age 36 I had no previous criminal history and had honorably completed four years of U.S. military service.

In three days, I was reduced to living in poverty and was homeless for weeks. I am no longer employable in my field due to my “criminal” history — 5th degree domestic assault with no conviction. My house was recently foreclosed and I have lost everything.

Thanks to our VAWA laws and a series of outright lies by an immigrant residency-seeker, a law-abiding American citizen can be left penniless. All of your assets can be seized and given to the immigrant even if you are innocent of the charges.

The courts have violated my rights as an American citizen and I am alienated in my own country.


http://dontgetmarried.proboards75.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1203782258

This gets back to the theorem that "all women are the same, only cultures differ". In other words, each culture puts limits on what women can get away with. In some Latin American countries women have to behave, because they have to. There is no other choice. Once transported to a different environment, such as American culture, it's like the doors of the jail cell being flung open. They can go crazy and wreak destruction because the culture lets them. In all cases women find it difficult to impose internal self-controls. The culture has to impose it on them.

In her own culture, if she turns out to be nuts, you kick her to the curb, if she committed adultery, you charge her with the crime of adultery, and keep the kids. She goes to work in a brothel, and you get another babe.

Women are takers. That's their purpose in life. They leech off of men on every level.

Anonymous said...

We are not falling in love, we are just falling apart...

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=CSq3Q3qBY0g

Hey boo how are you?
Oh my god, i miss you so much
How'd you been?
We should hang out sometime
Myspace me fer sure

What the fuck
You can totally see his fucking tracks
Oh my god

I know what the fuck
I mean he draw his eyebrows on with a fucking sharpie
I know fucking asses is it that

This is chris fucking donathan
Don't get mad Jefferee star
Cause I made you snort alot of my cum
While i fuck you in the ass

Fer sure maybe fer sure not
Fer sure eh fer sure bomb
Pulled up at a stop light did drugs on the dashboard
Look at the mess we made tonight

Kick off your stilettos
Kick off your stilettos
And fuck me in the backseat
Fuck me in the backseat
You're always falling in disguise
And always quick to compromise

Kick off your stilettos [oh yeah]
Kick off your stilettos
And fuck me in the backseat [fa-fa-fa]
Fuck me in the backseat
Fer sure maybe fer sure not
Fer sure eh fer sure bomb

This is the end of what we planned [of what we planned]
And now.

We're not falling in love
We're just falling apart [so girl let's dance the night away]
This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [Just let your body go]

This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [I wanna see your panties drop girl now]
All this time is wasted pretending we're in love
But that's alright cause you know
I love being with you and seeing you cry

So don't let go-o-o
Well don't let go, no-o
Don't let go

Fer sure maybe fer sure not
Fer sure eh fer sure bomb
Pulled up at a stop light did drugs on the dashboard
Look at the mess we made tonight

Kick off your stilettos
Kick off your stilettos
And fuck me in the backseat
Fuck me in the backseat
You're always falling in disguise
And always quick to compromise

Kick off your stilettos [oh yeah]
Kick off your stilettos
And fuck me in the backseat [fa-fa-fa]
Fuck me in the backseat
Fer sure maybe fer sure not
Fer sure eh fer sure bomb

This is the end of what we planned [of what we planned]
And now.

We're not falling in love
We're just falling apart
[so girl let's dance the night away]
This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [Just let your body go]

This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [I wanna see your panties drop girl now]
All this time is wasted pretending we're in love
But that's alright cause you know
I love being with you and seeing you cry

So don't let go-o-o
Well don't let go, no-o
Don't let go

No jkjkjk lololol
I heart your fucking makeup
Oh my god I love your hair
Is that a new tattoo?
Did that piercing fucking hurt?
No jkjkjk lololol

We're not falling in love
We're just falling apart [so girl let's dance the night away]
This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [Just let your body go]

This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [I wanna see your panties drop girl now]
All this time is wasted pretending we're in love
But that's alright cause you know
I love being with you and seeing you cry

So don't let go-o-o [All this time is wasted]
Well don't let go, no-o [Pretending we're in love]
But that's alright cause you know
I love being with you and seeing you cry
But that's alright

You got fucking jizz on my back
Where'd you threw my panties?
I threw them out the window bitch

Shut the fuck up.



This is what "love" has become these days.

Anonymous said...

That may be a good wife:
http://www.shaadi.com/partner_search/matrimonial_search/profile.php?profileid=ms_anjum02&set=1f173bcca6d45d9a8745d9245061e7c4#more


she is a very homely girl. likes to maintain the house n take care of her family member . she is very polite always respects elders . namazi Mashallah. nice personality very smart. she knows how to carry herself and speak to people around very imotional at times never makes mistakes but if she then she knows how to make it up .

Her Family
her parents died long back. she has her own two bothers, studying. one sister she also studying. she is the eldest one in her family. we are close in there reletions so we adopted them except her everybody else"s is in hostel and studying. she always had interst in house making so left studies but she is so smart that she can handle in society. wherever her luck is going to take her, she is going to make that house a perfect home that way she is very sweet.





Sounds good doesn't it? Ever read something similar about western women?

Anonymous said...

At 14 many young girls are very horny and they demand sex from guys. It is pretty disturbing when it happens to you for the first time - especially if you are a decent man.

It seems that these girls should be married, it would be better for them and actually do them a favor.

Further these young women want children, going to school is not what they really wish to do, they dream of having children.

They desperately want a boyfriend for sex and dress like whores.

This video illustrates modern behaviour of young women in a humorous way:
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDKq2Hz6NLA&feature=related

Young 15yo woman wants children:
http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=Epo8OcWGsW0&feature=related

Anonymous said...

Do not marry college women in the USA. 50% of Yale female students want to be mothers and remain at home.

On college parties women engage in sex and act and dress like sluts.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/sunday/commentary/la-op-mac_donald24feb24,0,6268838.story?page=2

Anonymous said...

That feminism would make women to what they have become was not foreseeable - the results are so extreme.


Busy doing nothing
Just what do housewives with nannies and cleaners do to fill time? Go shopping – and slowly mad, says our correspondent
http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/the_way_we_live/article3345831.ece


Can women still cook?
We're told now that liberated females don't inhabit the kitchen
http://www.thestar.com/living/article/302930
I know 2 women (22 & 23) that used their cupboards as storage bins for all the clothes they 'had' to have while in school. They used the fridge for cosmetics and other items, the oven for shoe storage etc. This is the mindset of modern women.


Too many female recruits hurt force, says Ashby
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/too-many-female-recruits-hurt-force/2008/02/23/1203467459953.html?page=fullpage


THE number of women accused of violence against partners has risen by almost 25 per cent in five years, and domestic violence workers blame the rise on police mistakenly arresting victims for trying to defend themselves.

Policies encouraging arrests for domestic violence have had the unintended effect of increasing the risk that women will be arrested with an abusive partner or be blamed for violence, they say.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/domestic-violence-victims-become-accused/2008/02/22/1203467388841.html


Twelve Norwegian firms face closure over gender equality law
Twelve small Norwegian companies, including first division football club Fredrikstad, have received an ultimatum to ensure gender equality in their boardrooms or shut down, authorities said.

A law has required that since January 1 all public limited companies have at least 40 pct women on their boards or close down.
http://www.forbes.com/afxnewslimited/feeds/afx/2008/02/22/afx4685590.html





The effects of feminism seem unreal and if in a thousand years people look back they may actually rub their eyes and wonder if all these things were just legends.
How could people ever implement regulations that deny the nature of women so much?

Feminism is a social experiment and the outcome has not been predictable - at least for most observers. Now, it becomes clear that the outcome is more than bad.

Anonymous said...

Slutty girls dancing to Fer Sure.

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=eXt8DP67mm0&feature=related

The right one is marriageable. Do they know what they do? Obviously.
Slutty, sluttier, modern girls.

This is the text of the song, it is pretty explicit:


Hey boo how are you?
Oh my god, i miss you so much
How'd you been?
We should hang out sometime
Myspace me fer sure

What the fuck
You can totally see his fucking tracks
Oh my god

I know what the fuck
I mean he draw his eyebrows on with a fucking sharpie
I know fucking asses is it that

This is chris fucking donathan
Don't get mad Jefferee star
Cause I made you snort alot of my cum
While i fuck you in the ass

Fer sure maybe fer sure not
Fer sure eh fer sure bomb
Pulled up at a stop light did drugs on the dashboard
Look at the mess we made tonight

Kick off your stilettos
Kick off your stilettos
And fuck me in the backseat
Fuck me in the backseat
You're always falling in disguise
And always quick to compromise

Kick off your stilettos [oh yeah]
Kick off your stilettos
And fuck me in the backseat [fa-fa-fa]
Fuck me in the backseat
Fer sure maybe fer sure not
Fer sure eh fer sure bomb

This is the end of what we planned [of what we planned]
And now.

We're not falling in love
We're just falling apart [so girl let's dance the night away]
This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [Just let your body go]

This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [I wanna see your panties drop girl now]
All this time is wasted pretending we're in love
But that's alright cause you know
I love being with you and seeing you cry

So don't let go-o-o
Well don't let go, no-o
Don't let go

Fer sure maybe fer sure not
Fer sure eh fer sure bomb
Pulled up at a stop light did drugs on the dashboard
Look at the mess we made tonight

Kick off your stilettos
Kick off your stilettos
And fuck me in the backseat
Fuck me in the backseat
You're always falling in disguise
And always quick to compromise

Kick off your stilettos [oh yeah]
Kick off your stilettos
And fuck me in the backseat [fa-fa-fa]
Fuck me in the backseat
Fer sure maybe fer sure not
Fer sure eh fer sure bomb

This is the end of what we planned [of what we planned]
And now.

We're not falling in love
We're just falling apart [so girl let's dance the night away]
This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [Just let your body go]

This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [I wanna see your panties drop girl now]
All this time is wasted pretending we're in love
But that's alright cause you know
I love being with you and seeing you cry

So don't let go-o-o
Well don't let go, no-o
Don't let go

No jkjkjk lololol
I heart your fucking makeup
Oh my god I love your hair
Is that a new tattoo?
Did that piercing fucking hurt?
No jkjkjk lololol

We're not falling in love
We're just falling apart [so girl let's dance the night away]
This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [Just let your body go]

This is how the beat drops
This is how the beat drops [I wanna see your panties drop girl now]
All this time is wasted pretending we're in love
But that's alright cause you know
I love being with you and seeing you cry

So don't let go-o-o [All this time is wasted]
Well don't let go, no-o [Pretending we're in love]
But that's alright cause you know
I love being with you and seeing you cry
But that's alright

You got fucking jizz on my back
Where'd you threw my panties?
I threw them out the window bitch
Shut the fuck up.




Todays girls are just good for a quick sport fuck, but NOT as wives.
Even so at 14 like these girls most of them have bodies suitable for child bearing.

Anonymous said...

It is unbelievable now even CHILDREN are dancing to the song fer sure!

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=rOoGb12lI28&feature=related

These are children!!!!!!!!

They are not even nubile!


Great Britain where have you gone?!?!?!?!?!?!

Anonymous said...

Just look at the bitchy behaviour and expensive clothes these girls display in High School Musical.

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=G8RbQQ2LakU&feature=related

Anonymous said...

http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=jO-cuRIPU3M&feature=related

More underage sluts between 12 and 14 years. Does no-one stop this madness? Later they complain about unwed teenage mothers, STDs etc.

The bizarre thing: if a man has sex with them it is statutory rape despite their sluttish behaviour.

In Italy their was a ruling that said that a 14 yo who had sex with men could not claim to having been statutorily raped by a specific man.

The most INNOCENT looking young girl can be the biggest and most DISGUSTING whore these days.


It is not at all surprising that there so many 18 yo girls making money with porn on the net.

Anonymous said...

Very good post. If a woman has a right to choose (abortion or not) a man cannot be forced to pay child support, because it was her sole choice.

http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/02/womans-right-to-choose.html

A Woman's Right to Choose

Charles Moffat and Suzanne MacNevin asked:

http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/02/charles-moffat-canadian-artist-critical.html

"[Do you believe women have the right] to bear children when they wish to?"

Answer:

I suspect this is a trick question that deals with abortion, and not actually women’s natural right to bear children when they wish to. All females in the animal kingdom have the natural right to bear children, as I have already pointed out in a previous post.

Also, note that women are the ones who are in control. They choose to either abstain or get naked and spread their legs. They are the ones who know best when they are ovulating and thus are directly in control of “The Rhythm Method.” They are the ones who have the pill, condoms, IUD’s, spermicides, diaphragms, hysterectomies, the “morning after pill,” and abortions at their disposal. After giving birth, they are the ones who can decide to keep the baby, put it up for adoption or anonymously abandon it at a hospital, police station or fire department without fear of legal repercussions.

A man has only the choices of abstaining, condoms or vasectomy.

And yet, society whines relentlessly at the man for “getting her pregnant.”

This is entirely absurd, and it would appear to anyone on the outside looking in that women are complaining of oppression because they are the ones with all the choices.

But, I digress. Let’s get back to abortion.


I am sure that feminists will fast point out that 2/3 of the population supports abortion. But, as with almost everything that feminists say, they are only speaking in half truths.

What these types of abortion-support statistics are based on is that when surveyed, 1/3 of the population supports abortion-on-demand, 1/3 does not support abortion-on-demand but does support abortion in cases of incest, rape or when the mother’s health is at risk, and the remaining 1/3 are opposed to all kinds of abortion.

Feminists are quite aware that most uninformed people naturally choose cohesion to the larger group and that is why they dishonestly skew these statistics to make it appear that most of the population supports abortion. Everybody wants to be a “moderate” who is in agreement with the majority. It is a well known psychological phenomenon, sometimes even used in brainwashing techniques, and feminists manipulate it ruthlessly.

When one examines things a little closer though, it becomes apparent that abortions performed on victims of rape and incest, or those performed when the mother’s health is at risk; make up such a miniscule percentage of the total amount of abortions performed that it is far more accurate to say that 2/3 of population are opposed to the majority of abortions – that being, abortion as a means of birth control.

What a sneaky little trick that our “esteemed academics” have played on us with this wordplay.

Stalin, Hitler and Goebbels applaud them heartily from the depths of hell.

But, this whole argument gets even more absurd than it would first appear, precisely because feminists have successfully fought for the “right to choose.”

In a previous article, I pointed out that children are the product of woman's sexuality, which she owns 100%. It used to be that upon marriage; a woman sold her sexuality to a man and took his surplus labour as payment for it. Thus, the children of a marriage used to be considered the husband's children, while children born our-of-wedlock were considered to be the woman's property. http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2008/02/questionators-should-women-have-right.html

In times past, it was often considered the “morally right thing for a man to do” to marry a woman who got herself pregnant by irresponsibly using her sexuality out of wedlock. Society benefited from this socially manipulated moral pressure, as it has always been known that fatherless children were detrimental to society, thus the negative connotations associated with the word “bastard.” But, under no circumstances was a man legally obligated to “give the child his name,” to take ownership of the woman’s sexuality through marriage, and thus, make her child into his own.

But we live in different times today than we did in the past. We now have a plethora of birth control methods that have been made available to women. (Not men. Aside from a permanent vasectomy, men’s birth control methods have not changed much at all). And, to top it all off, if a woman fails to use all of the various birth control methods available to her, she is still offered the ultimate choice to kill the baby via abortion. And, let’s make no mistake about it; it is HER CHOICE, not the man’s, and not anyone else’s. Is this not the core of the feminist mantra, "A Woman's Right to CHOOSE"? Is not this “right to choose” enshrined in the laws of almost every Western nation?

So, I want to put a little comparison into your head to fully illustrate how absurd this argument has become.

Imagine Dick and Jane, two platonic friends, are walking down the street together and they pass a car dealership. They stop and admire a shiny new Corvette together. They both get a twinkle in their eye and smile as they see the other has the same thought: “Let’s take this car for a test drive!”

So, Dick and Jane roar out of the dealership in the Corvette. First Jane drives the car, then they switch positions and Dick drives it home. Ah, the joy of driving! Their hearts pound with excitement. The exhilaration of controlling a powerful beast! But, they never had any intention of actually “buying” the Corvette. They are just joyriding.

Upon returning to the dealership, they toss the keys back to the salesman, say “thanks,” and carry on walking down the road together without a care in the world.

But, alas, a month later Jane calls up Dick and informs him that she returned to the dealership after their test drive and purchased the Corvette, signing a 4 year lease with payments of $1,300 a month. Now she wants to know if he will “man up” and help her make the payments on it, because after all, they went on the original test drive together. Jane claims that he planted the seeds of desire into her head which caused her to choose to purchase the Corvette.

Of course, Dick tells her to get bent. She chose to purchase the car of her own free will and he is not responsible for her choices.

Jane does not allow things to just quietly go away and take responsibility for her choices, however. No indeed! In fact, she gets herself a lawyer and Dick is served a summons to appear in court where Jane is bringing a lawsuit against Dick, to force him to pay for her new Corvette.

Dick goes to court as he is required to, and walks out completely dumbfounded by the judge’s decision:

Because Dick went on the original test drive with Jane, the judge declares that Dick is liable to pay “damages” to Jane. After all, Dick planted the seeds of desire in Jane’s head by agreeing to go on a test drive with her. Therefore, the court declares that Dick is responsible for Jane’s choice to purchase the car.

Since Jane is the one who has the responsibilities of driving the car, washing the car, and providing a parking space in the driveway for the car, Judge MacKinnon rules that it’s only fair that Dick contributes his share to the upkeep of the Corvette: Dick must make the $1,300/mo lease payments, in addition to paying for the insurance, gas and maintenance to operate the car.

Dick requests of the judge that he be given the right to drive the Corvette himself from time to time, but Judge MacKinnon rules against Dick’s request because it is not his car, and therefore he has no "rights" to it!

You can see why being a Dick is not a good thing to be.

But, is this not the exact situation we are now presented with since “women have the right to choose?"

Most places have laws on the books called “Fetal Murder Laws.” Take states like California or Texas, for example. Fetal Murder is considered to be a Capital Crime, punishable as if the fetus were a living, breathing human being. http://www.statesman.com/news/content/news/stories/local/02/14/0214flores.html and http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2003/04/24/fetal_harm/index.html

Killing a fetus in these states is considered equal to murdering a human being.

But, how come then, a woman and her doctor are not charged with murder in the event of an abortion?

It is because of the woman's right to choose, which even supercedes murder laws!

And, let’s just clear this up a little. It is not that the woman is choosing whether she wants to have a fertilized egg inside her or not. She has already passed up on choosing several safe and easy birth control methods before she got to the Right to Choose phase.

What a woman is “choosing” is whether what is inside of her is a human life to be honoured and revered, or just a useless piece of tissue to be flushed down the toilet.

If she chooses that the fetus is just a useless piece of tissue instead of human life, then the state fully backs her up and says the fetus is not alive, and therefore she cannot be guilty of murder when she rids herself of it.

But, if she chooses that the fetus is to be a baby, then the state backs her up and says that if someone causes her fetus to miscarry, that person is guilty of homicide – of taking a human life.

So you see, while a woman may have a fertilized egg inside of her as a result using her sexuality with a man, the “right to choose” dictates that it is nothing until the woman chooses, of her own free will, whether or not she wants “this thing” to be a baby or disposable garbage.

And, God forbid that she loses that right to choose. Why, that is enshrined as a woman’s civil right, and to deny her this choice is to oppress her! (Mother Nature is a really oppressive bitch).

But, it is clear that if a woman has “a right to choose,” then she does not actually become pregnant until after conception. She becomes pregnant only when she chooses to of her own free will.

So, how on earth can feminists and the corrupt courts possibly demand that a man should be legally and financially responsible for her choice?

If she “chooses” for it to be a human life and have a baby, then it is absolutely no different than if she chose to go into a fertility clinic and become pregnant through artificial insemination. And, in such situations, she is responsible for the consequences of her choice, including financial responsibility. (Although, the corrupt courts have been changing this too, and the move is on to make anonymous sperm donors financially liable for her offspring as well.)

A man should only be responsible for the child if he himself has chosen to be so of his own free will. And, that choice usually comes through marriage.

Are women to be treated as children in our society? Why don’t feminists demand an end to this insulting farce and declare that women are independent and can handle responsibility for their own choices? Why do they insist that others should pay for their choices?

“Rights without responsibilities” is the state of a child.

“Responsibilities without rights” is the state of a slave.

“Rights with responsibilities for one’s own actions” is the state of a full fledged citizen; a full “person” under the law.

Why do feminists keep demanding that women be treated like children and men like slaves?

Why don’t women stand up and declare their equality by refusing to be coddled as though they are toddlers who cannot be held responsible for their own choices?

Why are women granted the right to be “dead-beat citizens?”

It’s time to choose to “man up,” ladies.

What’s taking you so long to choose to grow up?

Anonymous said...

Brides oppress bridesmaids - how will they oppress their husbands?

http://www.nypost.com/seven/02242008/news/nationalnews/rule__1___dont_get_fat_99085.htm


RULE #1 - DON'T GET FAT
BRIDES' WEDDING CONTRACTS
By SUSANNAH CAHALAN
BECKY & CALL: Kristi Serrano, of Long Island, gets some help with her bridal gown from her pal Becky Trunk, who will be a bridesmaid — just as long as she follows the bridezilla's strict set of rules.
BECKY & CALL: Kristi Serrano, of Long Island, gets some help with her bridal gown from her pal Becky Trunk, who will be a bridesmaid — just as long as she follows the bridezilla's strict set of rules.
PreviousPauseNext
PrintEmailDigg ItRedditPermalinkStory Bottom

February 24, 2008 -- There's a new prenuptial agreement in town - and it's beyond anything even Ron Perelman's lawyers could cook up.

Young brides are drawing up bridesmaids contracts that are sure to cause rifts between BFFs in bad floor-length dresses everywhere.

The agreements include specific grooming and behavior clauses - specifying everything from the required length and style of bridesmaids' fingernails to prohibitions on gaining weight before the big day - with the threat that those who don't comply will be dumped.

Anja Winikka, associate editor of the Wedding Channel, said, "I've heard stories of brides asking them to dye their hair, cut all nails to the same length, go tanning."

More than 20 percent of brides-to-be said they would use a contract to control bridesmaids, and half of them said they would sack one if she refused to follow the script, according to a survey conducted by UK magazine You & Your Wedding.

New Yorker Kristi Serrano already has that stipulation in writing: "If you are late (for pre-wedding photos), you will not be walking down the aisle."

The 25-year-old Long Island native sent out a seven-page PowerPoint contract to her 12 bridesmaids a week ago - though her wedding to fellow Long Islander Chris Librizzi is planned for September 2009.

She has already dumped one bridesmaid who couldn't adhere to the rules.

"It was uncomfortable, but she agreed that maybe this job was too much for her to handle," Serrano said.

"If they can't do it, then they shouldn't be my bridesmaid."

She spent two weeks creating the contract, which outlines every aspect of her $60,000 wedding and all of the rules for her dozen attendees.

Do get a tan before the big day - and cover tan lines with self-tanner.

Don't let her suspect you have been drinking.

Serrano's bridesmaid Becky Trunk, who has known the control-freak bride for four years, said she laughed when she received the contract.

"Knowing her as long as I have - I mean she's been talking about her wedding for four years - it's not a shock. But it is hysterical," she said.

There's a kicker. In addition to the $260 bridesmaid dresses, specific black-satin heels (that must have a 1- to 3-inch heel), and professional nail, makeup and hairdos, Serrano has slipped in a page about the bridal shower - which she will plan but will be in touch regarding "the costs you will incur as bridesmaids."

Anonymous said...

Beware Of The 'Bridezilla Syndrome
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/08/20/earlyshow/leisure/books/main519238.shtml

As a dozen of us sat there, waiting for dinner to be served, my friend lifted her glass and toasted herself and her boyfriend. "I just wanted to let you all know that Dave and I are getting engaged, just as soon as we have the ring. It's all picked out. It costs six thousand dollars!!"
Then when I learned I was going to be her maid of honor, I asked why not her best friend? The bride replied: "She's not pretty enough."

Anonymous said...

How russain women try to land a rich husband:

http://dontgetmarried.proboards75.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=1203955635

marieclaire.com/russia-school

Lessons in LOVE: THE MILLIONAIRE HUNTERS
by Abigail Haworth

In the new Russia, a country obsessed with wealth & status, snagging a super-rich man is big business - and so are the outrageous classes that claim to be giving women a leg up. You have to admire a nation of women who wear stilettos in the snow and make it look easy. It's minus 10 degrees in Moscow, and the frozen sidewalks are teeming with glamorous female shoppers. Clad in fur and sparkly accessories, they navigate the ice in perilously high heels. The trick, it seems is not to totter gingerly, but to stride ahead fast and never look down. After mastering this art, you'd think that negotiating love & marriage would be a cinch for modern Russian women. Not so, says Yulia Varra, 38, a Muscovite "love instructor" who runs classes in sex and seduction. In the new capitalist Russia, a country consumed with money & status, snagging a desirable man is a tough business. "Women want a husband who owns a private plane, a yacht, and an oil well. It's not impossible, but they need super-fantastic skills to succeed," says Varra, who has a riot of curly blonde hair and wears tight black jeans tucked into silver boots - high-heeled, of course. Despite the weather, it's positively steamy inside the Moscow basement where Varra holds the various courses for women, including "How to Marry in 3 Months" and "Oral sex for Experts." Her seduction school is one of many new businesses designed to help women get ahead in Russia's post-communist marriage market. The economy has boomed, creating a super-rich ruling oligarchy and a huge class of cash-loaded entrepreneurs. And, in what is no doubt partly a backlach against the Soviet era - when women toiled in state industries alongside men - many young women today would prefer to marry a millionaire than work to become one themselves. Varra says she encourages students to look beyond a man's wallet to find other good qualities - to avoid being trapped in a "loveless golden cage" - but outside the new rich elite, decent prospects remain sparse. Russian women outnumber men by more than 10 million, and many men suffer from joblessness, chronic alcoholism, and early death (male life expectancy here is 59).

Holding on to a good man long-term is an equally high-stakes matter. Divorce in Russia is easy; a powerful man can divorce his wife "in an hour," according to one local insider. Under the country's anachronistic divorce laws, husbands are generally not obliged to give their wives a penny, and they are often awarded custody of the children. "Relationships are like roulette for modern Russian women," says the insider. "They have a lot to win and everything to lose, so they can never afford to get complacent."

On a Saturday night at Varra's school, against a backdrop of garish reds & pinks, 5 students are gyrating their hips and tossing their hair to the manic beat of Russian disco (think early Madonna crossed with Cossack music). And this is just the warm-up. Tonight's class is "How to be your Man's #1 Lover." Lessons include trying out erotic massage on a live male model, practicing fellatio with the aid of bananas and lollipops, and learning how to praise a man's sexual prowess "convincingly."

"Russian men relate to women mainly through sex," Varra tells the students who range in age from 21 to 60, and wait as long as a year-and-a-half to attend the popular classes. "So if a man is happy in bed, you're half-way there." But only halfway, she cautions, because even the most sexually acrobatic woman won't succeed unless she knows how to manipulate a man's brain as well. "You must show him you have self-respect, that you are a precious jewel he must cherish," says Varra, who is a trained psychologist with 3 divorces under her flashy silver belt. "Otherwise he will get bored & drink vodka." She winks. (interestingly, Varra herself is not looking for another husband; she is focused instead on her booming business.)

Varra's basic approach is to teach women how to gain power over men by using classic feminine & sexual wiles. To the Western feminist mind, it might seem a bit retrograde, yet Varra insists that Russian women are the ultimate postfeminists. "We know all about equality and independence - we've been there," she tells me. During the Soviet era, which ended in 1991, millions of men died in wars and labor camps. Women often ran their households alone, while also working in factories. The problem is that Russian men, says Varra, remain deeply patriarchal and still expect women to be subservient. "Rather than try to change men, which will take another 200 years," she says, "we might as well get whatever we can out of them now."

Perched on a sofa in the correct femme-fatale posture of "chest out, stomach in, ass out," Maria Markova, 24, nods in agreement. Markova, a typical svelte Russian beauty with long blonde hair, has already graduated from the 12-week "How to Marry in 3 Months" course, which costs$1800. She found it so enlightening that she joined the "Lover" class, too.

"I've never had a problem getting men because I'm so beautiful," she says, swinging her long legs over the side of the sofa. "But they treated me like a plaything, and I didn't know how to stop it." Markova, a sauna attendant, has learned how to target the men she likes using direct eye contact and conversational ploys, so she is in charge from the start. What she wants, she says, is a "real man who will take care of me." Some diamonds and designer frocks wouldn't hurt either. "Yes, of course he must be wealthy," she says, looking incredulous that the question was even asked.

Is money really so important? It's not hard to see how style- and status-conscious the country has become. In Moscow, one the grim heart of socialist austerity, ads for Swiss watches, German cars, and Italian leather are draped over the facades of historic buildings, and some city restaurants demand a minimum order of $300 per table. Even the former Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev has embraced luxury, appearing in a recent promotion for Louis Vuitton luggage.

Markova isn't married yet, although thanks to Varra's lessons, she says she is dating a wealthy businessman who she believes will "propose any day."

Foxy grandmother Ella Videnina, 60, is also a graduate of the marriage class. She succeeded in getting hitched at the end of it - to her fifth husband. "My past husbands always relied on me. I wanted to reverse that," says the slim Videnina, a government office worker. When she joined the class, she was dating a new man who seemed promisingly generous. "The best thing I learned was never refuse him anything in bed. It worked." Not only did he marry her, she says, he also began lavishing her with expensive gifts: "He gave me a new car and a plasma TV for my birthday."

Married women are also flocking to Varra for help in holding onto the husbands they already have. "After nine years of marriage, my husband stopped noticing me," says Olga Rosnina, 37, a statuesque redheaded real-estate agent. Rosnina joined Varra's "How to Bring Back your Honeymoon" course, which involved "advanced" sex tips, as well as advice on how to spice up daily life. "Before, I only wore jeans & flats, so I bought miniskirts, high heels, and lipstick," says Rosnina. Combined with her new bedroom skills, the effect on her husband was instant. "He's much warmer and less uptight," she says. "And he gives me whatever I ask for."

For women who can't get into Varra's overbooked courses, there are plenty of other options. One of the latest trends is "VUM-building," which sounds like a doomed Soviet industrial project but is apparently a surefire way to get your man addicted to you. VUM stands for "Vaginally Used Muscles," and a number of schools are offering courses in strengthening and toning the muscles using special equipment - a kind of gym for the vagina.

"Our exercise program can dramatically improve a woman's sexual performance," says Olga Nikitina, 40, the founder of the School for VUM-building in central Moscow. "She can transform herself from a slow Russian car like a Lada into a Ferrari." To disguise the fact that the equipment really does look like it belongs in a car mechanic's workshop - it's all pressure gauges and rubber hoses - the schoool's two rooms are painted pink & blue; stuffed animals model phallic devices. " Once a woman reaches optimal fitness, she can shoot a fountain of water up out of her vagina in the bath," boasts Nikitina, a ponytailed blonde in a leopard-print top. The core device is a small silicone balloon that is inserted in the vagina and inflated with a pneumatic pump. "You squeeze against the balloon and measure the pressure on the attached gauges," says Nikitina. Fine-tuning can be achieved by learning to shoot out pebbles onto a metal target.

Homemaker Eliso Torgvaidze, 41, credits the program with saving her rocky marriage. "Im sure my husband would have left me if I hadn't done the VUM-building," she says. "Sex is 90 percent of a relationship for a man."

If the latter is true in Russia, it certainly explains why sex schools are so popular. Moscow even has a geisha school that teaches seduction arts from the Far East, such as erotic dance. There's also a "bitch school," where women can learn cunning tactics for beating out female competitors. To give the gift of a head start, some women are even sending their daughters to the schools. Inga Kozina, 34, attended a course at Moscow's Geisha School, and now is sending her 15-yr old daughter, Mariam. "She's a pretty girl," says Kozina, "but there's a lot of competition these days."

Still, isn't 15 just a little bit young? "Not at all," says Mariam, decked out in the mandatory stiletto boots. "Thanks to my mom, I'm very confident with boys already. I'll always get what I want."

Anonymous said...

Women should rule the world says Dee Dee Myers.

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/23308727/?GT1=10856

If women were in charge, things might actually change.
Everyone would just hold hands and sing “Kumbaya.”

Anonymous said...

Humor?

http://www.amazon.com/Feminists-Say-Darndest-Things-Politically/dp/1595230424/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203965252&sr=8-2

Anonymous said...

"I dated alcoholics and bar brawlwers, I am over 30 now and cannot find a husband - who can help me?!?"

What sounds like a joke is actually true:

http://www.oprah.com/tows/slide/200704/20070427/slide_20070427_350_111.jhtml

Kathy says she dated alcoholics and bar brawlers for years.

Gayle sits down with four women to discuss the complexities of dating in your 30s…and beyond.

Elisa, a 35-year-old, says she always assumed she would get married. Then, when she turned 30 and still hadn't met Mr. Right, she began to worry. "It's difficult at first because you do start to think, 'Maybe it is me,'" she says.

Finding a man isn't the only thing these women worry about. "I'm 39 and it's scary because I want children," Lisa says. "I hear that clock ticking and ticking and ticking. … I'm worried I'm going to grow old by myself."

Anonymous said...

The first is a takeoff of "Why Can't a Woman be More Like a Man?" from the movie My Fair Lady.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Why can't a woman be more like a man?
Men are so honest, so thoroughly square;
Eternally noble, historically fair.
Who, when you win, will always give your back a pat.
Why can't a woman be like that?

Why does every one do what the others do?
Can't a woman learn to use her head?
Why do they do everything their mothers do?
Why don't they grow up, well, like their father instead?

Why can't a woman take after a man?
Men are so pleasant, so easy to please.
Whenever you're with them, you're always at ease.

Would you be slighted if I didn't speak for hours?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Of course not.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Would you be livid if I had a drink or two?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Nonsense.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Would you be wounded if I never sent you flowers?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Never.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Well, why can't a woman be like you?

One man in a million may shout a bit.
Now and then, there's one with slight defects.
One perhaps whose truthfulness you doubt a bit,
But by and large we are a marvelous sex!

Why can't a woman take after a man?
'Cause men are so friendly, good-natured and kind.
A better companion you never will find.

If I were hours late for dinner would you bellow?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Of course not.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
If I forgot your silly birthday, would you fuss?

COLONEL PICKERING:
Nonsense.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Would you complain if I took out another fellow?

Pickering
Never.

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Why can't a woman be like us?

[dialog]

PROFESSOR HIGGINS:
Why can't a woman be more like a man?
Men are so decent, such regular chaps;
Ready to help you through any mishaps;
Ready to buck you up whenever you're glum.
Why can't a woman be a chum?

Why is thinking something women never do?
And why is logic never even tried?
Straightening up their hair is all they ever do.
Why don't they straighten up the mess that's inside?

Why can't a woman behave like a man?
If I was a woman who'd been to a ball,
Been hailed as a princess by one and by all;
Would I start weeping like a bathtub overflowing,
Or carry on as if my home were in a tree?
Would I run off and never tell me where I'm going?
Why can't a woman be like me?

Anonymous said...

Anon @ 21 February 2008 09:24

You need a total of 16 books just to learn to program a computer? God you must be a real bonified wizkid to need so many books. Tell me, can you read any of them or can’t you make up your mind which programming language you want to program in. You know jack of all trades are masters at NOTHING. But I’m sure because you have a vagina you believe you are simply better and smarter than men. Well, got news for you, once you turn 30 and the bio clock starts ticking, we’ll see who was smarter.